User talk:TR-BT

Just to let you know Jon Pertwee's last episode was Robot not Planet of the Spiders.

First off I didn't know it was active footage, secondly and allow me to be blunt you don't need to get a fucking attitude with me. You don't need to be a smart ass to me unless you want me to give it to you right back. Thirdly you aren't in charge of me so don't go telling me what to fucking do just because I didn't know that it was active footage. Do we understand each other TR-BT?

Well I may have been ignorant to the fact that it was archive footage, but you're ignorant on how to treat people when they are trying to inform you about something even if they are wrong. You need to work on your attitude skills. [jmatt41494]

Oh and FYI it's "are ignorant of" thought I'd let you know seeing as how you felt it necessary to correct my grammar. jmatt41494 (talk)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 18:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Y'hear that, Daizenshuu #2? You don't count. TR-BT (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Nerve Gas House
Patrick stated that is was supposed to be the nerve gas house, but he didn't think fans caught on. It's at 21:00-23:00. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 19:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Eleventh Doctor. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► draftsman ─╢ 23:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jack Harkness stories
Template:Jack Harkness stories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► Lord Speaker ─╢ 22:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jill Tuck-Kramer
I have nominated Jill Tuck-Kramer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jill Tuck-Kramer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Defender of torch (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Forum postings
About your edit here on adding casting details that was posted by Kevin on HOJ.. unfortunately per WP:V it states, "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media, whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, Internet forum postings, tweets, etc., are largely not acceptable." I'm trying to decide if it would be OK since it is from Kevin (that's verified) or just wait until 3rd party sources (BD, etc) reports it. Of course they may just report the forum posts, which will still be identified as the primary source, while BD/DC/STYD the third party source. It's confusing, and Wikipedia may never catch up the modern way of reporting news. Btw, are you member of HOJ? Have I spoken to you on there? — Mike   Allen   01:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alternative versions of Joker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Egregious personal attacks
On a long-retired account, my query is whether your account has been hacked or you've just decided to put the boot in? FYI for a behavioral assessment. 01:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)  SN54129  01:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, I believe I must have been hacked as I have no idea what this is. I’m able to use my account and everything seems normal though. I will change my password (if I can remember how!) I’m not a big contributor anyway so if there’s a problem with the account I won’t be too broken up if you need to get rid of it or anything TR-BT (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case, as long as you can still access the account, a change of password is probably all that's needed. Apologies for assuming dickishness! Best,  SN54129  02:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * FWIW, my stab at offender profiling leads to the conclusion that either this account was hacked or someone slipped magic mushrooms into their dinner. The editor interaction analyzer says that the edit histories of TR-BT and the retired editor have precisely zero pages in common. RE has some habitual adversaries, and the bloviating style of this one points to the array of usual suspects. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)