User talk:TRAITORSEEKER

February 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to John C. Eastman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kpddg  (talk)  04:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at John C. Eastman, you may be blocked from editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at John C. Eastman. Kpddg  (talk)  05:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Traitor
This is not my opinion.. plz abide by the rules TRAITORSEEKER (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 05:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Nuetral
I think you need lesson in neutrality. Quite sure you are TRUMP support so might be tough with you.and request an escalation to seek a neutral point of view..have you read today's new york times lead article.?Either Eastman doesn't know the law, or is a traitor. You very well cover all his legal angles. But refuse to call him what he is. Get an education. People like you damage our democracy. TRAITORSEEKER (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)