User talk:TRUTHINCommons

August 2021
Hello, TRUTHINCommons, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Grazmach Tameru Lemma
Hello, TRUTHINCommons,

Thank you for creating Grazmach Tameru Lemma.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article requires more references to meet notability requirement on Wikipedia. WP:GNG applies to this article. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Grazmach Tameru Lemma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grazmach Tameru Lemma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Grazmach Tameru Lemma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Girth Summit  (blether) 06:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi - we don't host articles about subjects that have not been written about by reliable published sources. We also do not host articles that only one account is permitted to edit. WP:NOTABILITY and WP:OWN cover this. Girth Summit  (blether)  06:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Nobody owns a page on Wikipedia
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Grazmach Tameru Lemma, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ethiopian National Defense Force drones for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethiopian National Defense Force drones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ethiopian National Defense Force drones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mztourist (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Qenazmach Bihonege Lemma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qenazmach Bihonege Lemma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Qenazmach Bihonege Lemma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mztourist (talk) 08:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Notability and sourcing
Before you create any more pages please read WP:N, WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. If the only information available about someone comes from their family then they are not notable as they do not have "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject." Wikipedia is not a genealogy site, if you create biographies of people who don't have significant coverage, then they do not meet WP's notability requirements and will be deleted. Mztourist (talk) 08:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:LEKReports&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/LEKReports. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)