User talk:TR Welling

I have research on subjects. However I do not have the resources to effectively create my own database.

Welcome!
Hello, TR Welling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mjölnir did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. &#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I am very aware of of the facts the "editing" board at Wikipedia are full to the brim with hard core born again Christians who del anything and everything which does not support that framework. A "it is their christian duty to shape all content so it will not offend them." However what I wrote is all facts and I site 3 of your own articles. So exactly what did I write which was not fact?


 * Just to clarify a bit, nothing we're talking about has anything to do with "editing boards" or born-again christians. Most wikipedia edits are by non-admins, including myself. I also happen to not be a christian, though that wouldn't have affected my choice to revert anyway. What you added seemed to have almost nothing to do with the topic, for one thing, but also did not cite any reliable sources. You mentioned within the text a single sentence from another wiki article, but that isn't sufficient to justify what you wrote or clarify what it has to do with the hammer.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 20:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe I should just be more straight-forward and ask: Is the connection between this Egyptian pharaoh and Thor's hammer a conclusion that you came to on your own, or is that analysis from a verifiable source?&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

A hammer strikes. Hammers strike. Striking something with a Hammer. From your own article on Pharaoh Narmer "The Striker"; I can find about a dozen peer review articles on The Scorpion King his name Narmer means "To Strike". Hammers Strike. So you are stating that striking and hammers have nothing to do with each other?? Alrighty then. If not a born again, try reviewing evidence before by default del it. I draw a very strong evidence line between Thor, Thors Hammer, and Pharaoah Narmer. Add in the double head of the Hammer is a very close resemblance to the double head of Janus. Janus is the schema of Rome, and of course I can prove beyond any doubt in a single graphic that the schema of Rome and the Pyramids of Egypt are the same subject. Even the Nerves line up perfectly. From your own article "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%BBm" Ancient Romans were called "Rūm" or sometimes "Latin'yun" (Latins. Yun and Run add the e to the end Makes Runes, the language the stories of Thor are written in.

to answer the question, that is my research. My mind did its thing, and made those connections as I wrote it. My brain. But each point is from a peer review source. I combined the points eg mathematics, collect a sequence of proven (peer reviewed) variables and see what the new =x is.
 * So, here on Wikipedia the term for what you're doing is called WP:SYNTHESIS. It is a type of original research and is not allowed, even if the conclusions being drawn are reasonable. If you can get your ideas published by a reliable source, then they'd be appropriate for inclusion. Otherwise, you can publish them on many, many other sites on the internet that don't require such strict sourcing. Wikipedia just isn't the place for original ideas. Sorry.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

What a violent waste of time, on everyone's end. Authors by default have their posts del, you spent 99% of your time del posts. There has to be a better more efficient way to do this. If your standards are self admitted extremely strict, than everyone involved is wasting 99% of their individual time. Have a review board, have a chance to submit materials (give you guys the ... ability to reject a few times), reject (but add notes how to resubmit), and go through the process, etc. Instead of the current method where I would bet 100,000s of authors either refuse to submit their work or have done so and been rejected out of hand and refused to repost. Your current process is not only inefficient but it costs huge amounts of time and effort. Unless the "heir of superiority" on having the power to reject 99.99% of everything submitted becomes a power thing. Instead of everyone involved being upset and frustrated by this process, make it better for everyone. Unless the goal is to create frustrations.

December 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mjölnir has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mjölnir was changed by TR Welling (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952178 on 2019-12-19T20:02:05+00:00

I added a post "sabrina and you del" it included two references one from you the other from the bible. having every single edit deleted why waste time when they get del immediately. you have made it 1000% clear only a handful of people can make changes, everyone else gets deleted.

research dates
I would like to add my research to this database. It is about proving my linguistics research. However I need someone to alter the database. Everything, and I do mean everything which has a start that is a fixed point. That fixed point starts a number sequence. That number sequence can be converted to letters.... Language. With a bit of database and programming help, my research could be proved in a matter of weeks to months.