User talk:TRockferd

Speedy deletion nomination of Tommy Rockferd


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tommy Rockferd, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EricSerge (talk) 02:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, TRockferd. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tommy Rockferd, you should consider our guidance on Conflicts of interest and take a look at the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tommy Rockferd


The article Tommy Rockferd has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. ... disco spinster   talk  03:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Tommy Rockferd
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Statik-Dee


A tag has been placed on Statik-Dee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 01:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baltimore Ravens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Revolution (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nonstop Extreme Wrestling


The article Nonstop Extreme Wrestling has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable organization lacking references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 01:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nonstop Extreme Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Wolfe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to All Pro Wrestling does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ''Took me a while to determine if it was vandalism blanking or removing excess information - I think that a simple edit summary would've made that much easier to determine, in all honesty. '' Jackson Peebles (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Guido. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Nici Vampire  Heart  02:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HWA Heavyweight Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Morrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marcus Laurinaitis, you may be blocked from editing. Nici Vampire  Heart  14:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Dav Sorado. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dav Sorado


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dav Sorado, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Dav Sorado, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:58, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing - repeatedly adding hoaxes and misinformation, despite warnings. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
71.199.125.210 (talk) 03:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)