User talk:TSTUMMVOLL/Pollution prevention

You have some good material and it's generally well presented. I think your challenges going forward are twofold. First, you're editing a fairly extensive page, so fitting in new content will require expert 'surgery' on the existing page. I see how the Background material fits, but wonder if the Prevention Act material duplicates preexisting material? The second challenge is being detailed in your facts and avoiding even tacit editorializing. In the 'strategies' section your disdain for the 'light touch' regulatory model is clear (and I agree!). But you will want to avoid that, and the best way is simply to provide more evidence and facts. Choose the evidence that makes your case but present it without any 'angle' (the angle is simply what you choose to include). The more you stick to concrete examples and cases, the more convincing your narrative will be, and the less likely to be deleted by zealous Wiki editors. Brendankarch (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)