User talk:TSteichen

Hi. I like what you wrote:


 * Over the years I've noticed what seems to be increasing difficulty within Wikipedia in dealing with truly controversial topics. Not only is the description of the controversy often incomplete, but the in-house overhead of dealing with the editing by those of different points of view seems large and growing. But again, you'd know that better than I. It seems to me that giving a truly useful description of a highly controversial topic with a pure NPOV approach is very difficult to do while at the same time producing an informative and useful article.

I see the problem as editors trying to use an article to win an argument, rather than to give readers a chance to compare viewpoints and make up their own minds. --Uncle Ed (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)