User talk:TTO2014

April 2023
Hello, I'm Fred Zepelin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Labyrinth have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Fred Zepelin (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Fred,
 * Thanks for your message. It’s taken me some time to get back to this. I understand the concern about this looking promotional and want to revise it because I believe the information is an important contribution that I haven’t seen elsewhere in the article. Would this be acceptable and meet the Wikipedia standards:
 * After the sentence in the current article:
 * One can think of labyrinths as symbolic of pilgrimage; people can walk the path, ascending toward salvation or enlightenment.
 * I would like to add:
 * It can also be viewed as a coded map for spiritual seekers, which can be evidenced in the mystical teachings of myriad traditions across centuries of time.
 * And then just footnote the source, not mentioning the book or the names of the authors in the article.
 * Please let me know if this would be acceptable and again, thank you for your help as I am new to editing. TTO2014 (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)