User talk:TTTAAAMMMAAARRRAAA

September 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to William Beaver House, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

William Beaver House
This is your second warning regarding this article. Once again you deleted sourced material from the article for no good reason except that it was "opinion". Yes, it is opinion, but it is opinion which is sourced to a relaibel source. Do not removed sourced information again without discussion first on the article talk page. To compound the problem you added to the article blatantly promotional material that seems to be aimed at "selling" the building. Please see WP:ADVERT and do not do this again: Wikipedia is not a promotional medium. This material has been removed, and will continue to be removed if you keep adding it. Lastly, you added some sourced material about the sale of a unit, which is fine, but you followed it with unsourced about a supposed "record sale." Please do not add unsourced information of this type, which is promotional in nature.<p.Considering your edits, I have to ask if you have any kid of connection with this building or André Balazs, the other article you have edited heavily? If so, please see this policy about editing with a conflict of interest. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)