User talk:TUVA Partners

December 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC) You also seem to be an undisclosed paid editor; disclosing paid editing is a Terms of Use requirement, see WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Hi 331dot
 * Am not sure what the problem is here as I completed paid-contribution disclosure to say that I was working with ESS Inc. before I tried to write a very brief and factual article on the company. The article mirrors, but is much briefer than, articles on Wikipedia about similar companies such as Form Energy and I made absolutely sure that all content was factual and supported by citations.  Could you advise if I am able to contribute to an ESS article if I have completed the paid-contribution disclosure requirement, or is that still not allowed?
 * I also updated some very out of date facts on the VEON Group page as I happen to know someone at the company. I thought I was doing the right thing here and helping Wikipedia be more up to date - and am not being paid for this.
 * Thanks for your help and if you were able to unblock me I will make sure to follow the rules and only make factual updates that are not related to any clients (if that is forbidden). TUVA Partners (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Your edit history indicates no edits where you made the required paid editing disclosure. If you used the Article Wizard to create your draft and clicked the "I'm paid to edit" button, that is not a disclosure; no one other than you knows that you clicked that button. Please follow the instructions at WP:PAID to disclose.
 * Please read other stuff exists. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible in numerous ways for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about. If you would like to help us out, once unblocked you can identify other similar articles you have seen for possible action.  If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those classified as good articles, which have been vetted by the community.  Otherwise, you risk using a problematic article as a guide, and you would have no way to know that it was problematic.
 * Wikipedia is not for merely documenting the existence of a company and telling what it does or what it wants to say about itself. That is considered promotional here.  A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Press releases, announcements of routine business activities like the raising of capital or commencement of operations, interviews, and brief mentions do not establish notability. "Significant coverage" goes beyond those things through going into detail about what the source sees as significant or influential about the company(not how the company sees itself).
 * Please read the block notice and the pages linked to therein carefully, before you request unblock as instructed. You will need to make a request that simultaneously proposes a new username. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks - and if I have understood correctly then I should never be creating or editing articles about companies that I have any financial connection with. Is that basically the case?
 * For the VEON updates, those were just factual corrections as the information has not been updated since 2016. I see the corrections I made to the VEON article have now been reversed - which is a bit of a shame and seems ironic given the need for Wikipedia to be more accurate.
 * Thanks. TUVA Partners (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't directly create such articles, but you may submit drafts via Articles for Creation if you have disclosed the paid relationship. However, many in your position are unable to edit as I describe above- they only want to summarize the activities of the company- which is not what we are looking for, we are looking for why independent sources consider a company to be notable. In this situation, we usually want to see the editor involved edit in areas unrelated to their conflict of interest, so they can demonstrate their understanding of Wikipedia content and notability guidelines- otherwise, just allowing them to edit about their COI wastes the time of everyone involved(including the editor).  However, if you can demonstrate your knowledge as part of an unblock request, you may be permitted to submit drafts sooner.  So, in short, your options for requesting unblock are
 * agree to temporarily refrain from making COI related edits and tell us what you will edit about instead, or
 * convince us that you can write about your clients/things for which you have a COI as Wikipedia requires.
 * While Wikipedia strives to be accurate, sources must be provided(primary sources are okay for things like personnel). 331dot (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:ESS Inc.
Hello, TUVA Partners. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ESS Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ESS Inc.


Hello, TUVA Partners. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ESS Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AESS+Inc. request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)