User talk:TYTA Mahesh

Welcome!
Hello, TYTA Mahesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikih101 (talk) 20:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IW engine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: IW engine was changed by TYTA Mahesh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957513 on 2015-04-05T01:05:24+00:00.

Integrated and dedicated graphics comparison
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Integrated and dedicated graphics comparison, and it appears to include material copied directly from www.ehow.com/facts_6737699_integrated-vs_-dedicated-video-card.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Integrated and dedicated graphics comparison


A tag has been placed on Integrated and dedicated graphics comparison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from eHow. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Integrated and dedicated graphics comparison


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Integrated and dedicated graphics comparison. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Video_card. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Video_card – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wikih101 (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 82.132.236.222 (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at User talk:Ravanellidiciamo, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 10:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Janfusun Fancyworld, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 10:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Wikih101 (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sacred Heart College Chalakudy
Hello TYTA Mahesh, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sacred Heart College Chalakudy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article does not meet any of the four speedy deletion criteria that you said it met. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Award
What was the award for?  Tea Lover 1996    Lets talk about it  20:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Usernames
Please do not warn other users about their usernames unless until you have sufficient experience of Wikipedia's username policy. Wikipedia policy does not preclude usernames that are all in caps, as you suggested to this user. WJBscribe (talk) 14:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

User talk:216.157.209.66
You warned this ip user with level 3 warning when they did not do anything wrong. I don't see any vandalism in the edit history of the user. You should not warn them without any strong reason. If you are testing please use sandbox. Warnings can hurt or discourage users. Please don't do that again. I saw your edit history because you applied for pending changes reviewer and account creater rights just after me. Again don't do that again. Supdiop ( talk ) 05:36, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, please don't use level 3 warning (if somebody vandals) right off the bat. For example: If somebody left a level 4 warning in March, don't leave a 4im waring in April. For each month a user does vandalism, you usually do level 1 (sometimes level 2, it depends). Please be careful with these tools. If you abuse them, you could be blocked. Thank you!  CookieMonster755   (talk)   00:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)