User talk:T Cells/Adopt/Amunique /Test

First lesson
Five pillars of Wikipedia

This test is going to be based on questions. One word "Yes" or "No" answers are unacceptable. I want to see some evidence of a thought process. There's no time limit - answer in your own words and we'll talk about your answers.

1. Q - You have just been told by your friend that Muhammadu Buhari got married to Janet Jones 5 years ago. Can you add this to the Muhammadu Buhari article and why?
 * A -No, because is not from a reliable source. ✅. Informations from friends or any family members are generally not considered reliable.

2. Q - Vanguard Newspaper for example published a content that which you see as clearly defamatory to Osun State Government. Can you include this content to the Osun State Government article? Why?
 * A -No, because anything that is against the reputaion of a person or any organisation is nt welcome on wikipedia.. It can be included since Vanguard newspaper is a reliable source but such content should be included with common sense.

3. Q - Would you consider The Punch a reliable source on Bola Tinubu? Would you consider ''The Punch'' to be a reliable source on its rival, Vanguard? Why?
 * A -Yes, because is a reliable source and no, because both are reliable source so none is more reliable than the other.

✅. The Punch is a reliable source and can be used on the article. Both Vanguard and The Punch are national dallies. The punch is not in anyway more reliable than Vanguard.

4. Q - Would you consider Olu Jacobs's official Facebook page a reliable source? Why?
 * A-No,social network, blog or forum are not consider reliable souce in wikipedia and also any source that is self published is general considered unreliable.

✅. Facebook, blogs, Youtube, Instagram and all other social media are generally not considered a reliable source.

5. Q - Would the official website of the Lagos State House of Assembly be a secondary source to establish the notability of Desmond Elliot?
 * A-yes, because is a politician but more sources maybe required.

✅. The official website of the Lagos State House of Assembly can establish his notability but more sources are needed to write a decent article.

6. Q - Would you have any issue with using the About Us page on Unilever as a source for the history section of the Unilever article.
 * A -Yes,because any self published source is considered unreliable.. Editors shouldn't have issues with using the "About us" but the entire section should not solely depend on that alone.

7. Q - Would you have any problem with "Youtube" link being used in a music-related article?
 * A -No, because is a reliable source for music and videos.. Youtube can be used provided there are more reliable sources that supported the claim. Although Youtube is not a reliable source.

8. Q - Everybody knows that the sky is blue right? An editor doesn't agree - he says it is bronze, do you need a source?
 * A -Yes, because all wikipedia article are based on neutrality that is personal opinion is not welcome. So new sources are require.✅. Yes, reliable sources are needed.

9. Q - Everybody knows Muhammadu Buhari took over from Goodluck Jonathan right? An editor doesn't agree - he says it is Olusegun Obasanjo, do you need a source?
 * A -Yes,because neutral point of view is required on wikipedia sources are require.✅. Reliable sources are often used to validate claims.

10. Q - We all agreed that The Punch is a reliable source but you found the same sources for a Newspaper columnist who is an employee of The punch. Will you consider the columnist notable? . No! Such sources are primary sources and usually not enough to establish notability. A columnist don't get freebies article on Wikipedia simply because they appears on the homepage of their employer.