User talk:T Cells/Archive 20

Learning how to use Wikipedia.
Just sign entries like this? Martinscriminalcode (talk) 20:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)martinscriminalcode
 * good of you. I think you are reali learning now. You had just sign on my talk page. Wikicology (talk) 21:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Selective factor 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preinitiation complex. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Improving JuvodHR article
Thank you. We will take your advice and improve the article.JuvodHR (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Olufemi.jpeg
To use an image that is currently on thw web, you need one of two items For more informaton see WP:DCM Ron h jones (Talk) 20:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) The web page shows a license to CC-BY-SA or less strict (CC-BY; CC-0; PD)   or
 * 2) The web page owner sends in permission to at least CC-BY-SA

Reverting disruptive editing
Hello Wikicology! I saw the article for Chevrolet Corvair and I wondered what happened to it. Thank you for fixing it, because I don't know how to do that. Once again, thank you.--Kevjgav (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Wikicology (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Regarding creating a new article
Hello, I wanted to create a page with name "Anand Kondapi" Who is an Indian scientist. The page I got inspired from is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niyaz_Ahmed. I mistook last time while giving title. So plz next time review my page and don't delete. I have learnt now how to edit the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krish13LSMI10 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I describe your message here as “inserting a nail on your nose”. Am not convinced that you had learnt anything about editting with what you had demostrated in your message above. You left a message without signning! I left a message on your talk page. Wikicology (talk) 20:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

CSD Philippine Dog Athletics Organization
Hello. Just a note that the appropriate CSD criterion would have been WP:G7 since the only substantial contributor blanked the article. Regards.  KJ  Discuss? 12:31, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Born to Race
Hello. I replied to your post at MaterialScientist's talk page, but thought if you had any questions it would be better discussed here, than back and forth on his page.

The actions I would take in this case would be to move Born To Race to Born to Race (2011 film) and then move Born to Race to Born to Race (1988 film). -- Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  21:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * thank you for your concerned sir. If I may ask you, with all sense of humilty don't I have the right to ask questions on his talk page as an eligible editor?  And what do you mean by back and forth? Wikicology (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry no, I didn't mean anything like that. Your post is still there and MS or anyone else can still respond there. I was merely supplying another avenue for discussion if you had any technical questions about a page move. It would be better to have that discussion somewhere other than another editor's talk page who may, at that point, not yet be involved. MS doesn't answer everyone one of the posts he gets on his talk page (I have noticed my last two have gone unanswered), but I hope he answers yours! -- Racer X11  Talk to me Stalk me  21:57, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * you are very right! Nice to have you here. I hope you are not embarraced with my question sir? Wikicology (talk) 22:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Not at all. All of your concerns were legitimate and understandable. BTW, you may have noticed that someone has already made the two page moves I had suggested. All the best to you. -- Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  22:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Diary of Dreams
sequel to the above article, I observed that you change Adrian to 'hate'' without explaining your reason for the change in the edit summary. let me mention here that there is no diference between Adrian and Hate has proved from the reliable souces in the article. It is Adran Hate. I will gladly restor the last edit if you faill to justify your action .Wikicology (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transcription Activators in Eukaryotes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

RE: August 2014
A lot of the music articles here use YouTube for official music videos from artists. It helps the reader who looks at the Music video section of the article want to see the video in question. DepressedPer (talk) 10:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * kindly have the decency to takes to correction, otherwise you will be outside, peeping through the window. it does not in any way establish the WP:Notability of the subject. Perhaps I will keep you on my watch since you had refused to takes to corrections. Wikicology (talk) 10:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * See WP:SONG. Linking a song article to its YouTube video is allowed and is a very common practice on WP. See also Template:YouTube. -- Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  11:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * thank you for your contributions.Am glad to inform you that I understand Wikipedia policies and guildlines. First of all I never objected the linking of Youtube to a notable music article, but I will totally object it when the aim of an editor or specifically the article creator is is to use it to establish notability which was trying to do. Sincerely the article fails WP:Notability (music) in its current state. The article had been tagged with maintainance tag  pointing at adding references to reliable sources to establish its notability. But no attempt made by the creator to establish notability which is an indication that the music is not notable. This is not about its singer or the producer. A singer of a song may be notable but that does not means the music itself is notable.WP:Notability (music) clearly explain the criteria for notability. The song have not been ranked on National or significant music chart, it has not won significant awards or honors, it has not been performed independently by any notable musician or bands, which are the basic criteria for notability. perhaps I will consider it for WP:AFD. Wikicology (talk) 12:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I was talking about this revert in which you included the edit summary: "Reverted addition of unreliable source: youtube."; and this "warning" issued to DepressedPer where you say: "Youtube, Facebook, Myspace, blogs, Badoo etc are unreliable sources. Kindly refrain from adding any of them to Wikipedia article." Sorry, but based on these two comments, I assumed you were blanketly opposed to adding YouTube links. -- Racer X11  Talk to me Stalk me  12:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not opposed to it at all. My action was in sequel to the aim of the editor/page creator to use Youtube to establsh notability, having having nade no attempt to establish its notability. I expected him to use its time to add references to [[reliable source]

]S to the article rather than merely adding link to Youtube. How does it appears to you? Wikicology (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Molecular tools for gene study, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Some comments
Re: [].


 * 1) I don't think that user's talk page is the right place for comments directed at a third party. My own talk page would have been a better place to voice your concerns.
 * 2) That user knew perfectly well what was meant with vandalizing. It wasn't the first time; check his contribution history. All his edits at Our Lady's High, Cumbernauld were plain old vandalism.
 * 3) Regarding my reply on my talk page that you found rude: I have no patience with people who lie to me. That other person was clearly lying, so I called his or her claim nonsense. Again, it might be difficult for you to see that since the image in question is long gone. (It was a plain copyvio; uploaded and detected at the Commons, the user then came to my talk page here only to lie about it.)
 * 4) Kindly have the decency to refrain from lecturing me. I have my reasons for using simple and blunt statements when somebody vandalizes. In my experience of ten years, that gets the point across better than a test1, test2, test3 sequence, which then typically is followed by a block. I also don't see why I should have any patience with people who vandalize.

Lupo 06:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * first of all, I don't think you even understand the meaning of third party despite your claim of years of experience. You were directly involved, soo you are not a third party. The appropiate place for my comment is were you left your unuseful comment. You are suppose to educate new users as to their edit behavior not to use foul languages and harsh words to scare them, they night have a better contributions to Wikipedia. If you want to warn a user, do it properly with the right wanning templates. Refusal to refrain from vadalism after several warning will lead to a block. It's my responsibility to educate you as anti-vandalist. It is Not only edit behaviour that constitute vandalism, been impatients with new users may also constitute   vandalism. All experienced editors were once new editors. I need to keep you on my watch.Wikicology (talk) 10:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620689561 your edit] to Kenyan transport and auto industry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The [http://e n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya Kenya] automotive industry has come a long way and has seen tremendous

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621471785 your edit] to Hugo Arechiga Urtuzuastegui may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:57, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hernando H ugo Arechiga Urtuzuastegui ( Culiacan, Sinaloa , 11 March of 1940 - Izmir , Turkey , September

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=622069085 your edit] to Epidermolysis Bullosa Activity and Scarring index (EBDASI) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * a scoring system that objectively quantifies the severity of Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). "ABC", Spanish newspaper"</

Rohit5673
Yeah i corrected my mistake. (Rohit5673 (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ipetumodu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yoruba and Igbo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of huge chunks of text from "Mauritius History"
Thanks for the prompt reply. I wish to bring to your attention that links were provided to the chunks of text that have been recently deleted. (Were the links unclear or ambiguous?) Furthermore, the deletions were "selective". One last thing: is there a limit to the number of words for a particular section? (I am referring here to the History section for Mauritius.)

JLindsayD (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * am not seing any link here. kindly provide a link to the seletive deletion here.Wikicology (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

The link to the selective deletion is as follows :https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mauritius&diff=623595351&oldid=623429560 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JLindsayD (talk • contribs) 13:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to sign. Here it is.

JLindsayD (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ .Wikicology (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! JLindsayD (talk) 16:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Request on 15:39:37, 3 September 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Mariacarles
I dont know why was the article declined. Was it already published somewhere else? What did I miss? Thanks Maria Carles

Mariacarles (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Draft:Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range submission was decline because it does not appeared encyclopedic. It was essay-like. I left a message on your talk page. It will guild you in written your first article.Wikicology (talk) 16:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

14:44:25, 3 September 2014 review of submission by Hirefire
Honestly, having read all of your linked guidelines, I am at a complete loss as to why this article is unacceptable. I cannot find any "peacock terms" in the text. I have cited numerous professional journal articles and numerous other independent, published sources. I don't see any violation of your guidelines on encyclopedic tone. (For example, there is no use of the first person.) I would much appreciate your providing specific, concrete examples as to where the text can be approved, so that I can respond to them one by one. Thank you. Hirefire (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * , First of all, the first few lines of the article was promotional and no independent third party reliable sources supported claims. The subject notability was not supported by significant reliable sources. Majority of the sources cited were primary sources which can not establish the subject notability. Journals are not reliable sources.Wikicology (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The Wikipedia link to "reliable sources" states: "Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable, where the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses." Based upon that criterion, references #4 through #40 are all "reliable sources." Surely, you cannot mean that the U.S. Surgeon General's Reports (references #4, #5) have not been "vetted by the scholarly community." Surely, you cannot mean that the British Medical Journal (references #9 and #18), the American Economic Review (#12), the Journal of the American Statistical Association (#21 and #32), and the Journal of the American Medical Association (#20) aren't "reputable peer-reviewed sources." Surely, you cannot mean that the University of Chicago Press (#27 and #28) is not one of the "well-regarded academic presses."

I am certainly prepared to include additional third-party claims to support notability. (For example, the subject's reference #24 is cited by Wagstaff and Cuyler (J. Health Economics 2012; 31:406) as among the top articles in health economics in the last four decades.) To further support notability, I can also make more prominent the subject's receipt (as an American) of an honorary citizenship in the City of Salamanca, his recognition by the Fulbright board, his invited membership in multiple committees of the National Academy of Sciences, and his invited testimony before Congress.) Before doing so, I need more clarification as to what counts as a reliable source. Are you saying that all of the cited sources must be secondary sources that go solely to notability? A balanced, encyclopedic review of an individual's work cannot include primary sources published in some of the world's most prestigious peer-reviewed journals? Hirefire (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hirefire (talk • contribs) 18:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see what makes him more superior than an averege economist in every part of the world based on the sources you had provided. All economist have several articles in peer-review journal even more than the ones you had presented in the article. That has not makes them notable! All you need to establish his notability is secondary reliable sources Since you are prepared to add third party reliable sources, go ahead parhaps it will make a difference. Please always preview your comment before you save it and always remember to sign your comments. Wikicology (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)