User talk:T oldberg

Statistics and Nuclear Power Plants
I'm presuming you're the Terry Oldbery of.

If so, I'm not the one who removed your paragraph. I actually sent it to the NRC for comment so we'd have a balanced story. That letter was returned unopened (I had an old address on it). Now the NRC has a new on-line system for questions, so I've just resubmitted your paragraph. We should hear back in no more than ten business days. Simesa 09:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Nuclear safety - defense in depth
If you want to criticise the defense in depth concept, please do not do it in the image caption. Add your text to the Nuclear safety article body itself. -- Petri Krohn 20:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Response to Petri
Dear Petri:

The image caption uses the English language in an unusual way. Shifts in the usual semantics of words tends to make a theory sound like it is a fact, closing off debate over whether this theory is a good one before this debate has begun. I am reluctant to invest my own time in contributing to Wikipedia under these circumstances. Is there a way in which we can work around this problem? Why not make the changes I proposed earlier?

--T oldberg 04:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)