User talk:Taanashah

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Surat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Surat was changed by Taanashah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878929 on 2020-10-27T14:24:53+00:00

I am new as an editor, if you can assist me with my edit suggestions. Thank You. Taanashah (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

"vandalism" was Zero in my edits, but if you can assist me with specific lines corrections, that will be a great help. I want to insert efforts of surat's administration & citizen's about Rain Water Management & making Surat city a " Water Smart City" Taanashah (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia accepts content that has been previously published by reliable, third-party sources, written in your own words from a neutral point of view, and not outside Wikipedia's scope.


 * Your edit was reverted by an automated script, or bot, that is programmed to look for certain patterns of writing that have been deemed as typical of vandalism. Though your edit might have been well-intentioned, it was not acceptable for these reasons:


 * Your source was Facebook. Social media sites are self-published; that is, the person who writes the content can also publish it. This disqualifies almost all social media sources, because Wikipedia defines a reliable source as a source that has an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight.


 * Sources must also be independent of the subject under discussion. This means that the source has no vested interest in the subject and is therefore trusted to have a truly objective point of view.


 * Statements like "Surat is a city who learns from others experiences quickly" and "Citizens and GOVT bodies are very responsive to problems", and phrases like "internationally renowned" are subjective in nature. They do not conform to a neutral point of view, which requires that statements are expressed in an unemotional, dispassionate tone. Avoiding "peacock" expressions that may introduce bias or precision, is crucial.


 * I'm sorry this message could not be more favourable. Please check the links in the welcome message at the top of this page to learn more about Wikipedia's policies, editing culture, and ways to learn how to edit constructively. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Taanashah


A tag has been placed on User:Taanashah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

User page
Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goal as they relate to editing Wikipedia. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not: The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
 * a workspace for a draft article
 * a personal website, blog, or social media site
 * a space for self-promotion or other advertising
 * a CV/resumé
 * a lengthy autobiography

January 2021
Hello, Taanashah, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Dear Controller, Yes, We accept that TAANASHAH was a person who was assisting us for creating article on Wikipedia. But He tried to promote our work instead of SHARING VERY USEFUL RESULTS & INFORMATION to Students & PLANET savers. So We asked him to stop promotion & rewrote the content by removing contact information & some text which looked promotional. You can please assist us IF We have made any error again. The information & research shared in article can be vital for the PLANET SAVERS. RAIN WATER MANAGEMENT (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Dear Team, Above statement from RAIN WATER MANAGEMENT is true. It was a writing error done by TAANASHAH. RAIN WATER MANAGEMENT ( www.facebook.com/boon4us ) is genuine  Taanashah (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * In response to both editors above:
 * A userpage is not an article. It is a page intended for you - the individual who operates this account - to write a small amount of biographical information about yourself, and talk about your interests and goals as a Wikipedia editor.
 * Wikipedia articles must be about notable topics. These are subjects that are of interest to the world at large and over a period of time. We consider evidence published by reliable and independent sources to judge this interest.
 * Reliable sources are sources with an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. This generally means mainstream news organizations (TV, newspapers), and magazines and books from reputable publishers. Self-published sources such as social media are not reliable; content on social media is published by the person who writes it, and therefore lacks editorial oversight.
 * Wikipedia does not publish articles about worthy causes, no matter how good or important their work is, or is claimed to be. Only if they meet the aforementioned notability criteria will they be considered worthy of inclusion.
 * Writing to "create awareness" or "give vital information" to the world is still promotion and advocacy if the topic isn't notable. You must prove that this topic is worthy of inclusion by showing evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.
 * Wikipedia discourages editors that have a close personal or professional connection to a subject from writing about it. Doing so is a conflict of interest; while not prohibited, it is highly discouraged due to the inherent difficulty writing from the required neutral point of view without the intent to promote or advocate.
 * --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)