User talk:Tabdu296

Speedy deletion nomination of Dis-N-Fect


A tag has been placed on Dis-N-Fect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 20:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Dis-N-Fect
With respect to the above-captioned article, I've noted the "hangon" tag you applied and the material you left on its talk page. Unfortunately, it's not sufficient for you to state reasons why you think the topic is important. What is required is that you provide evidence that an expert source or "reliable source" thinks it's important or notable, or that the topic has widespread news coverage in some depth of analysis. The expert sources would have to be things like articles in books, magazines and newspapers (not blogs or forums) and they must be verifiable. Because I could identify nothing that would allow this topic to qualify for retention, I've decided to agree with the individual who tagged it for speedy deletion. However, if you feel you can provide reliable sources as defined above, there is no bar to your recreating the article. You might want to create a "sandbox" page and work on it before recreating it; as you will have realized, scrutiny of new articles here is swift and diligent. You might also look at this article for some basic background information about Wikipedia articles, or WP:Why was my article deleted?. If you have questions that are not answered by following the links in this paragraph, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)