User talk:Tac2z

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Tito xd (?!? - help us) 01:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Lift
But if a principle (that packets of air rejoin at back) is erroneous why put it in??? Bob aka Linuxlad 22:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I recently heard Ira Flatow say, on a respectable radio program, that Bernoulli's principle has nothing to do with lift. After looking around a bit I decided that Bernoulli is essential to lift, I just thought that I might point out that it isn't Bernoulli that is wrong about lift, it is the mistreatment of Bernoulli. It may not be essential, but many people have heard the "equal time" explanation. I was taught that myself in highschool. Tac2z 00:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)