User talk:Tadpolefarm

}}

License tagging for File:Estadio de Libertad Bata Guinea Eq Jul 2010.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Estadio de Libertad Bata Guinea Eq Jul 2010.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit to Mbombela Stadium
I saw that you added the Pumas as a tenant at Mbombela Stadium, though mentioning that it is not finalised. Do you have a source to say that the Pumas will move to the stadium on a permenant or semi-permanent basis. I know that some memebers of the Pumas union have spoken about it since the Blue Buls match their, but am yet to see anything concrete. I do know that the stadium management was trying to get Black Aces to move to the stadium. I won't edit out the Pumas, as it completely likely that they may move, however, some form of a reference would be great.

Thanks

Crazydude22 (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

importScript( 'User:Evad37/OneClickArchiver.js' ); // Backlink: User:Evad37/OneClickArchiver.js

Glider types
Tadpolefarm, please make yourself aware of List of gliders and also of the excellent website from Claude Lecombe at ,. As you will see you have far more than on your list to choose from, maybe you should re-consider the path you are taking with the article.--Petebutt (talk) 08:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Petebutt, The table of gliders is still to be expanded so that it is extensive list of the significant glider types that have existed. The sort function of the table is of particular use as this allows the ranking of the types by any of the column headings.

Proposed deletion of Glider types


The article Glider types has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Un-needed duplication of List of gliders, probably a bit misleading as it is a list not a discussion on types of glider (which also exists as Glider (aircraft)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 12:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Stephanus Swart
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.artefacts.co.za/main/Buildings/bldgframes.php?bldgid=11620. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa. The source text that you refer to was authored by me. In addition it is of a transcript of text on a monument which needs to be recored word for word otherwise it is not accurate.

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Witness (South African newspaper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kimberley ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Witness_%28South_African_newspaper%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Witness_%28South_African_newspaper%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Yoco
Hello, i created an article about Yoco, a Cape Town based company. I think it meets criteria of notabilty to be in Wikipedia, but it was unfortunately put as article for deletion. Can you please give your opinion as an experienced contributor ? Articles for deletion/Yoco Technologies Thank you in advance. MathieuPaul1977 (talk) 13:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Chernobyl use of graphics
Thanks for your note on my talk page.

Your animation is an excellent way of allowing people to understand the reactor layout and accident damage to supplement the text. The Chernobyl disaster WP article is too wordy, and needs this kind of thing. I have also seen your work on the RMBK page.

I have seen the video, and it gives an excellent general appreciation both of the reactor layout and the accident. Also helps with understanding the relative size of the core.

Two quick points to note. The positive void effect is not caused only by the increased temperature of the fuel, but by the excessive generation of steam bubbles in the tubes due to failure to remove the heat. At higher temperatures there is self-controlling action due to the decreasing fuel rod reactivity. This ceases to operate below about 700 MW when the negative void effect become dominant. That is why the RMBK reactors are unstable beneath that level. Not all reactors need to be shut down for refueling; for example, pebble bed reactors, RBMK reactors, molten salt reactors, Magnox, AGR and CANDU reactors allow fuel to be shifted through the reactor while it is running.

see https://www.euronuclear.org/e-news/e-news-13/neutron-kinetics.htm Dougsim (talk)

Hi Dougsim. I appreciate the comments and corrections on my video, some information I only came to know after I completed the video. I need to get comment on the words by the knowlegables in my next video before posting it. And I understand better why RBMK was unstable at low power below 700MW at which point the void co-efficient becomes negative.

History of gliding
Afternoon Mike,

Thanks for the rather flattering note on glider history and today’s prod! I don’t know a lot but have a god library. The best series by far on this topic is the 3 vol set by Martin Simons, “Sailplanes”. If tine and cash allow - it’s not cheap and the model builders hang on because of the detailed, large, 3 views – it’s well worth getting, as Simons lived near my nearest gliding ground, Camphill, in Derbyshire and watched events, including a fatal crash (a Petrel) in 1938. I met him there about 75 years later,when he was briefly resident here. He does pick out the signifiant points in gliding history rather well.

I was glad you started with Lilienthal but think that, if you are going to include the early times when gliders were a path to powered flight, critical in understanding aerodynamics and control issues, then the Wright glider(s) should be in too. Without their 1900-2 (?) gliding experiments, no Wright Flyer in ‘03. It’s also the case that in 1911 they stayed up a long time using (sand)-dune lift; later others in the flatter parts of Europe often flew along the North Sea Coast (Netherlands, N.Germany) loo.king for such lift.

One background event to bear in mind is the post WW1 Allied ban on aircraft building. For some reason, perhaps because no-one took gliding seriously, they ere omitted. Hence the German interest in them which made them the leaders for decades, particularly through their Universities.

There was a large change of gear between th 1920 and 1921 Wasserkuppe meets. Largely hang gliders at the first and rigid, more conventional aircraft at the second. The Vampyr is a good example and is, as far as I know, the first glider to stay up a long time, using ridge lift. You could stay up but not usefully go far. Not sure about the Kakadu it was remarkable in 1928 though other designs came close in aspect ratio.

One important 1928 design was the RRG Professor, fitted with a variometer and the first glider to get lift from thermals deliberately. I’d choose it over the Fafnir for that reason.

The 1933 Minimoa was not the first gull-wing glider- There was the Moazagotl in 1933 and even the tailess Weltensgler fron the second Wasswekuppe- but it helped to cement a trend. I don’t think there’s much evidence that the gull wing was an aerodynamic advantage but I guess it help visibility fro the back seat of a two seater without the ground effect of a mid-wing. In days before flaps, that effect made landings difficult. A bit like the later butterfly tail, it was a fashion that came and went.

The 1937 Reiher was one of the first derssiurgns to emphasise good, low speed, tight circling behaviour for thermals and high cross country speeds to the next, so yes to it.

The lure of laminar flow, using the NASA 6 series airfoils, started soon after WWII. The 1950 US Ross Johnson RJ-5 was one of the first, the Breguet 901 one of many others.

There had been a gradual increase in the use of plastics but GRP was a game-changer. The first “glass ship” seems to have been the FS-24 Phönix in 1957. T-tail as well; another fashion! V-tails also came and went. I’m not sure off the cuff of the first example but the HKS-1 appeared 1n 1953 and led to the HSK-3 that’s on your list.

There’s no doubt the ASW-22 looked and flew well (glide ration 56!), aspect ratio 32. Winglets and other tip extensions test. You last two choices keep us up to date, as well as waving the SA flag! You’ve got off to a good start in the limited overs contest with England, I notice.

Anyway, much agreement and some suggested changes. Fell free to ignore!

Yes, I’d be interested to hear the narrative. It all sounds good fun.

Cheers,

Tim Searle, aka TSRL (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks TSRL. I appreciate your reply. I tried to get Martin Simons book but the shipping would make it a very expensive book. I am still busily 3d modelling the gliders for the video.  When it is a bit further progressed I will let you have it for comment.  Cheers Mike Tadpolefarm 10 February 2020, at 16:49

Dan Mace moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dan Mace, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks PRAXIDICAE🌈 I have tidied up the article. All content now with citations. Please review and let me know what else might be done. Tadpolefarm (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Maximo Bell has been accepted
 Luke Maximo Bell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Luke_Maximo_Bell help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

importScript( 'User:Tadpolefarm/OneClickArchiver.js' ); // Backlink: User:Tadpolefarm/OneClickArchiver.js

Wikimania 2022 in South Africa
Wikimania 2022 is almost here (11-14 August 2022) and will be held entirely online this year with the exception of a number of local mini-Wikimania's for local community members. I just wanted to let you know that two local Wikimania mini-events will be happening in South Africa; one in Cape Town and one in Johannesburg. Participants will be able to attend both the international event from these local events. If you are interested, available and in the area at the time we would be delighted to have you join us. For more information please checkout the South Africa mini-event page here. You can also fill out the interest form here. Discott (talk) 09:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Mace (August 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Mace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dan_Mace Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidEfraim&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dan_Mace reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim (talk) 09:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dan Mace
Hello, Tadpolefarm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dan Mace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dan Mace


Hello, Tadpolefarm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dan Mace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)