User talk:Tagishsimon/C8

Tagishsimon Talk Archives

 * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Removed trolling
Just to let you know, I remove Elsie trolling (the organ damage thing) that you responded to Nil Einne (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Good stuff. I'll try to avoid feeding them. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks :-) hydnjo (talk) 23:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 G W … 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. – xeno talk 20:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Looks good. My source seemed very anti-BP. Now we have balance. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 16:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

RD Computing
Oops, no. I had the edit pane open for really long, and reloading it didn't have an affect for some reason. Thanks for fixing it. Paul (Stansifer) 18:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * And, more importantly, it didn't have an effect, either. Paul (Stansifer) 18:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

MSH Flight Training
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider taking it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Adeliza
The citation guideline explains my edit. If there are two sections the list of general references goes under References and the list of citations goes into Notes

To see an article with a large list of both have a look at something like the Battle of Waterloo. -- PBS (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

"I think that's a very poor reading on your part of the intent of the WP:CITESHORT element of that page." I don't think so, I directed you to the section Footnotes that is directly before the WP:CITESHORT section.

For Attribution see the section "where to place attribution" in the plagiarism guideline. -- PBS (talk) 01:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Railways
Thanks for the note. I do remember doing the edit, but I can't remember why I didnt complete at the time. Maybe I got distracted or maybe I found some non standard cases on page B and couldnt figure it out. I can run a script to do an auto conversion, but it's probably worth getting the template right first (ie extending out for all the possible optional information). I'm not a great template expert but I think there's some kind of { { if } } tag to help do this. I'll start a discussion on the template tag talk page to try and get consensus on what should be in the templates.ChrisUK (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Priories
Hi. Pleased you are interested in monasteries. I'll ask The Anome Bot to add coordinates, no worries. I was not sure if it was waterfall of orin because the category says is a waterfall of Scotland..Starzynka (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

List of monastic houses in Bedfordshire. I did source a few of them to British History website and dates were correct so I thought it reliable.Starzynka (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. i had forget about Wales, Scotland and Ireland priories. I will start later and will add a see also link if this is useful. I also have Belgian priories to start.Starzynka (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Richard Annesley, 6th Earl of Anglesey
You may want to have a look at some changes I made to this article. Would be interesting to see if you consider them vandalism or constructive edits... Anyway, someone within a better knowledge of the subject and the legal case against his nephew should have a look at the article. Tryde (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Article creation
Have you seen Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval. People are trying to stop me create articles. I should be free to create manually if the topic is encyclopedic. If I am not free to use subst:pagename and create then i waste my time here and will leave wikipedia. Wikipedia is supposed to be free to edit., there is not good law on this site.Starzynka (talk) 17:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit on A6 (Croatia)
Hey, just wanted to drop you a line and invite you to "reply" to copyedit requests that you're working on, so that other editors can see at a glance how the requests are being handled. Also note when you finish one up. You can use the and  templates with your signature if you find that to be convenient (what I do). Thanks! –Paul M. Nguyen (chat&#124;blame) 00:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Bacon !
Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 08:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Bacon has been created, and you are cordially invited to join, and list yourself as a participant at WikiProject_Bacon!
 * You may also feel free to add the userbox - User Bacon - to your userpage, to indicate your participation in the WikiProject.
 * The Bacon WikiCup is also ongoing, more info about that at User:SuperHamster/Bacon Challenge 2011, and User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011.

Thank you very much
Thank you, for your positive comments about my work, in the deletion discussion for the article Werner Erhard vs. Columbia Broadcasting System at the AFD page Articles for deletion/Werner Erhard vs. Columbia Broadcasting System. Your comments are most appreciated. Thanks again, -- Cirt (talk) 18:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Earls of Northumberland
Hi Tagishsimon; i wonder if you can help. An addition you added here to the above wikticle seems to be substantially the same as a chunk of text from here. Did they take it from us, or is it possible you inadvertently violated copyright? If the former, no worries; if the latter, maybe we can work on eliminating it. Cheers, LindsayHi 15:51, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

London Wikimedia Fundraiser
Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Sociology membership
I see that within the last year you have made at least one substantial comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology, but you have not added yourself to the project's official member list. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter here). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:42, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Artur Balder References
There are references to Artur Balder as writer in the most important Spanish media. I list some of them:
 * References: I dont know if it should be done here, but I will add some references below.

El País, published for instance in nacional sites, culture, books 2006: http://www.elpais.com/articulo/cultura/Artur/Balder/triunfa/narrativa/infantil/debuta/historica/elpepicul/20060610elpepicul_5/Tes?print=1

On the other hand it is strange that someone can state that may be the Artur Balder of Little Spain is not the same as the Artur BAlder of the books, since at the official site of the documentary you can download the press kit in high resolution, and in the chapter that it dedicates to the director, Artur Balder is the author of El Evangelio de la Espada, Crónicas de Widukind, and this is too in the GERMAN wikipedia stated. Both links:

http://little-spain.us/Little_Spain_Prensa_2010.pdf

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artur_Balder

The Little Spain official site links to an official Flickr site where is clear to see the references of Artur Balder. I invite you to visit the www.little-spain.us

Artur Balder is author of, as far as I know, 7 novels, some them translated into 8 languages, including nederlands, italian, french, with major publishing houses. The publishing house in spanish for his fantasy fiction is Random House Mondadori. You can read at the corporate website of RHM the recommendation of the author:

http://www.randomhousemondadori.com/Sellos/SellosFicha.aspx?Idioma=En&id=15

The historical fiction is being published by Edhasa, a major prestigious publishing house in Spain:

http://www.casadellibro.com/libro-el-evangelio-de-la-espada-cronicas-de-widukind-/1811185/2900001410005

The official site for its last historical fiction, published in november 2010, had a shortfilm for promotion of the saga, and all the information is available in english, german and spanish, with an excerpt of the book in russian, too:

htt://www.widukind.eu

References caused by announcement the documentary of "Little Spain":

http://www.google.be/search?q=%22little+spain%22+documental&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:es-ES:official&client=firefox-a

Looking at the search result you can see ALL the spanish media in the list in the first 100 results, from La Vanguardia, El País, El Mundo, La Razón... Just all. There is consensus about the relevance of the work of Artur Balder in relationship with the restoring of the historical memory of a large number of immigrants in New York City and Little Spain.

The information, that was not intended primarly to the american media, was however trnaslated from agency EFE AMERICA reports into the pages of the Chicago Tribune and Latin American Herald Tribune, and translated into english:

http://www.google.be/search?q=%22little+spain%22+documentary&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:es-ES:official&client=firefox-a

Particularly the link to The Latin American Herald Tribune:

http://laht.com/article.asp?CategoryId=13003&ArticleId=378105

And this is the resulat of a first private screening at La Nacional, the Spanish Benevolent Society of NY, last november, for the Spanish media and media agencies. Wikipedists have to know that the documentary is going to be released in a major film festival of New york city in 2011, but I cannot write down the name since it will be 100% sure.

The IMDb has accepted the credits of Balder's work in film industry during the last 10 years:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3470412/

Articles about Artur Balder are present in about 10 languages of Wikipedia, included the german one.

I hope I can rebuild a logical article about the subject, and later continue adding other contributions since there are a lot of historical interesting discoverings at 14th street of Manhattan in relationship with its Spanish American past.

Lolox76 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC).

What sort of Iron
Hi I read your comment on Iron FErtilization talk page. Would like to know more about your interest in Iron Fertilzation. We have invented a Nano silica based Iron product for use in water. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhaskarmv (talk • contribs) 05:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Hidden Report
Please explain where it is available, as the only link on that page does NOT link to the report. 86.173.174.159 (talk) 12:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The text banner at the top of the page is exactly that - a text banner. It has no link functionality.   My IP address changing is the fault of my ISP. 86.173.174.159 (talk) 13:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * That link is far from obvious. Why not use the direct reference in the article?


 * I have no intention of opening an account because I don't have to. I have enough usernames and passwords to manage without creating more. 86.173.174.159 (talk) 13:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Then that is your tough shit!  Anyone with brains would post the response on their own talk page where I have the intelligence to look for it. 86.173.174.159 (talk) 13:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I warned the user for the above post, as a personal attack.  Chzz  ► 13:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Umm, thanks. But I think he was just giving as good as he got.--Tagishsimon (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Vyacheslav Molotov
Thanks for copyediting the article, It looks much better now. --TIAYN (talk) 20:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot... You've made some very valid points, I'll implement them as soon as possible. --TIAYN (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:A4540 no tag.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:A4540 no tag.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  22:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:A4540 big tag.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:A4540 big tag.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  22:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 11:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Punch cartoons
WikiProject Punch cartoons, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Punch cartoons and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Punch cartoons during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  00:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed move of City of Bradford
Hi, I have proposed a vote on moving City of Bradford to City of Bradford Metropolitan District. Please could you vote on this issue and let anyone else interested know. Thanks -- Q Chris (talk) 09:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:A4540 small tag.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A4540 small tag.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Logan Talk Contributions 04:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cromford and High Peak Railway.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cromford and High Peak Railway.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

National Railway Museum
Hi Simon, your edit profile and images are evidence of your suitability to help the NRM and I have come across you virtually a number of times. I have met 3 NRM staff who want to work with us and two (3?) of them just need some assistance. We plan to hold a meeting there around June 22 which we would like you to attend as well, but we'd hope that we had started to assist them by then. As you are close then can I suggest that I put you in immediate contact with our lead person inside the building. If you could "adopt them" and look over their edits then I think they will make a useful contribution and I'm sure you will get an inside track on this interesting work. They intend to write a lot of articles about railway based paintings, but the first hurdle is for them to learn how to edit. Wikimedia UK (Who raise money and pay for Wikipedia etc~) are enthusiastic about the NRM and we really appreciate your offer of help. Do write on my talk page if you need any assistance to make this work. We would expect to pay reasonable for instance. It might be useul if you send me an email so you don't expose yours or our contacts. I am Victuallers on gmail. Thanks again Victuallers (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

David Lawson (author)
thanks for the help w/ the clean up. Not much there. Now the thing can get a good going over at AFD. Dloh cierekim  23:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Stalking talk page cleanup/archive
I don't know if you've checked out the Talk page for stalking recently, but is there any way you can get it archived? Let's get the nutty conspiracy stuff out of the talk section.Burred metal (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Tomorrow
If you can give me a 10 minute call then I'd like to see if you could help with QRpedia talk. I'm on 01332 702993. I would suggest you look here and here and then phone me tomorrow at 7-8:30. Roger Victuallers (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

York meetup
Hi. I'm still on for the Punchbowl this evening, but how do I know who is a Wikipedian/Wikimedian and who isn't? Are we in a private room or will there be some obvious sign, like a banner or WP teeshirts. Or will I have to ask around or what? All helpful information gratefully received. --GuillaumeTell 15:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Bare minimum wasn't satisfactory, I'm afraid. I arrived at the Punchbowl a minute or two after 7pm. The pub was quite busy.  I bought a pint and wandered around, trying to work out who might be Wikipedians and who not.  I approached a few likely-looking groups ("Excuse me, I'm supposed to be meeting a few people here, but I don't know what they look like - are you expecting anyone to join you?") but the answer was always no.  Nobody accosted me.  I assumed that you'd all be sitting at a table, but none of the tables looked very likely.  I even looked out for purple tops, but I'm slightly colour-blind and can't easily distinguish purple from blue.  Anyway, by 7.20 I'd finished my pint and was feeling fed up so I went home.  My journey wasn't entirely wasted, as I needed to pick up some rail tickets at the station (and I try not to drink too much beer for waistline reasons), but wandering around in pubs feeling embarrassed and accosting people isn't really my thing - and they might even have thought that I was up to no good.
 * The above is partly my fault, as I should have contacted you and other attendees a lot earlier than this afternoon, but still ....


 * More constructively, and FWIW, my thoughts on the matter are:
 * Choose a pub with a meeting-room, or a smaller pub
 * If that isn't possible/convenient, exchange photos (mine can be found at Online_Ambassadors/Mentors) and say in advance what you're wearing
 * Perhaps print off individual name-badges in some common format and wear them
 * Or wear some unusual article of clothing, or carry an unusual object, again notified in advance
 * --GuillaumeTell 21:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC) aka Disgruntled of York

Thanks for the note - water under the bridge now. I suppose I could have taken a book and hung around longer, but I was expecting that there'd be people there at or not long after 7pm. Hope the NRM thing went well. Ironically, I received this morning my free WP Online Ambassador sweatshirt/hoodie. Now, if it had arrived a day earlier... --GuillaumeTell 15:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

KMIC Conference Workshop
Hi Simon,

Great to meet you today. Hope you got something out of it too! Our student conference is visible here: https://kminterconference.wikispaces.com/ (treacherous I know, but it seemed to fit the bill at the time) The Workshops are on the Friday pm (15th July) and I think a Wikipedia workshop would be brilliant. I'm still waiting for confirmation from my co-organisers whether they are up for a non-student running something. If you could confirm your availability that would be brilliant. PatHadley (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok brilliant. I'll let you know as soon as I possibly can. PatHadley (talk) 19:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Emailed you from the conference gmail. Hope it isn't blocked by your spam filter. We have had confirmation of a room and wi-fi access but unfortunately no funding as yet. Hope we can talk something through PatHadley (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Wikimedia uk should be able to help - we have a director in Manchester Victuallers (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Pat's gig is in York. But we do have another gig in Manchester ... I'll talk to you this evening about it all and we can work out who's fielding which meeting. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
I wasn't alerting people to a discussion. I was trying to start a new one in a more appropriate place for wider community involvement. I pointed out the other current discussion purely for informational purposes. I've separated my own opinion out from the request. Please let me know if that resolves your canvassing concerns or not. --Onorem♠Dil 20:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I made another change to try to clarify my intent. I would appreciate if you would remove the extra discussion if you're now OK with my notice. (since I'm kinda the implied bad guy in the situation and don't want to ruffle any feathers) As to your last note, I want it at the village pump so that it sees a wider audience. Previous discussions on this took place there, on ANI, and through RFC I think. This is a guideline change on something that has been in place for years. The top of the VPP page says that The policy section of the village pump is used to discuss proposed policies and guidelines and changes to existing policies and guidelines. --Onorem♠Dil 20:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like you beat me to it. Thanks. --Onorem♠Dil 20:54, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Village_pump_(policy)
It seems like you are the one forgetting to assume good faith. I await your apology. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You'll have a very long wait, then. It wasn't you who was failing to assume good faith; my comment in that thread was not directed at you. There's also something comic about you being sooo upset over an accusation of lack of good faith in a thread you started, but so casual in deploying the same assertion here. Pot kettle black, etc. Thanks for calling. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

St. Mary The Church of Our Lady, Merevale
there is the Gate on the main road and there is a car park at the back and it is the church surrounded by the grave yard the picture just shows the entrance to the grounds. C. 22468 (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Your incivility at the RD again
See here: [], at the bottom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.14.198.240 (talk) 23:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Try learning how to link properly. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Schooner Hotel
Hey amigo, any chance you live near this or could pop down on a weekend sometime and photograph the hotel?♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Liz Davenport
Hey, I tagged the article with COI and I sent her msgs tellin her what to fix up, and I was gonna help the person once I woke up, but I see it's now deleted. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Why are you still bringing this up? The article is looooooooooong gone. Don't dare question my intelligence because I let one article go. Who cares, don't msg me again. Feel free to scroll through my contribs and see my CSDS, PRODS, AFDs, etc. One article I let go and you're coming at me. Don't msg me again. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 08:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Blair Peach
I agree with you about the place Peach was attacked as being worth geocoding as a significant location, but I don't think it is right to put it in the title area as "his" location; being attacked was not the only significant event in his life; even if you regard his death as the most significant, you have a choice of locations -- place of attack, place of death, place of burial... Might I suggest making it display=inline only, rather than display=title? -- The Anome (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Editing
It's all your :-)

Thanks --Jollyroger (talk) 12:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * When you are done, I'll recover some info that got lost in the editing conflicts. --Jollyroger (talk) 12:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sistema_Supporto_Condotta done
 * Intercity 2225 is the train name, not the trainset (as it's in UK). Intercity was a class of medium distance links, 2225/6 was the service between Verona and Bologna at the time (even number for the northeast-to-southwest connection, odd for vice-versa)
 * Both those claims were taken from the articles linked there (note n. 5). Those are two articles following the Bologna University study about psycho support to victims and rescuers. I add links to an online copy
 * Just a few days after, so 2005
 * Well, this is a point of significance at the time, and a well known issue. Not just my opinion of course. Railway network was slowly being upgraded, and this accident came to be an example of the need of a faster and more comprehensive approach. This statement was present, in different forms, in both the union's claims and in the official inquiry response.
 * I'm an experienced wiki editor (it.wiki mostly) but never managed to learn how to properly use those cite ref things. I had a custom interface add-on working on it.wiki but broke after the GUI change.
 * Thanks for your help --Jollyroger (talk) 13:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * This means that President Ciampi went to Foggia on a official trip, but was not supposed to speak in public. Victims' relatives waited for him and asked the President to say something addressing the tragedy (Ciampi was a beloved president). Some of them asked to meet him, and he agreed. He met in private with the relatives, and later kept an unplanned speech with the press about the tragedy. --Jollyroger (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC) P.S: Thanks again for your help
 * Up to three request again! --Jollyroger (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, would you mind do have a look at 1570_Ferrara_earthquake? That was a *long* one, from many fragmented sources full of technical jargon... --Jollyroger (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The Duke's death and the political struggle were major events strongly influenced by the earthquake. I think a wider view should be considered when relating to events that had major political consequences. Much like if we don't include considerations about Bush's politics in a Katrina article... Thanks for the cleanup --Jollyroger (talk) 06:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Circumvesuviana: maintenance was completed three days before. --Jollyroger (talk) 06:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyedits
I just had a quick look at two of the articles you recently copy-edited, as I do with all new GOCE members. Please ensure that you take care with:
 * Dates - ... January 1 2000 ... ... January 1, 2000, ...
 * "A passenger train (was or became) derailed by a ravine ..." -> "A passenger train was derailed close to a ravine..."
 * Refs should be after punctuation, not before them - Hello hello Blah blah . Hello hello. Blah blah

Murazze di Vado train disaster The rest of my changes were not that notable, general grammar and prose. To see what changes I made you can check the diff.

I also re-edited Circumvesuviana derailment- the diffs are here :
 * English most common names should be followed as per WP:COMMONNAME - Mount Vesuvius, not Vesuvio (and especially as the article goes on to use Naples, not Napoli). If both are to be included, one should be in brackets, eg: Mount Vesuvius (Vesuvio in Italian)
 * Numbers as words rather than numbers - Seventy-one rather than 71
 * Times - 11:10 not 11.10
 * Plurals - severe damages -> severe damage

Do not take this as a criticism, it is intended to help you understand how you might improve your copy-editing skills. Please try and read more WP:MoS guides, particularly the linked sub-guides such as Manual of Style (text formatting) and Manual of Style (dates and numbers), and perhaps consider doing some of the exercises on the GOCE copy-editing pages WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to.

If you have any questions or concerns about editing, do not hesitate to get in touch with myself or any of the other co-ordinators listed on WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Coordinators Chaosdruid (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

New Changes
I think I made some edits for this article, feel free to comment this article if this is much wrong or not simple. It may not match to its deletion policy. --Mohamed Aden Ighe 04:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Ears burning?
You're mentioned in User talk:Lifebaka. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Geotagging roads articles
I noticed the discussion about tagging roads related articles and although the proposal thats been put forward by Rschen isn't a perfect one it seems like an ok compromise. I noticed you didn't support or oppose it so I was wondering if you had any opinions about that disussion. I voted to support but I am of the opinion that adding geotags, for the most part, is a good thing. --Kumioko (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Jcttop
Jcttop claims to be "WP:RJL-compliant", but apparently doesn't include a column for coordinates. , in case I've overlooked something. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:DRN request
This is to let you know that there is a post involving you at the dispute resolution noticeboard. --Rschen7754 05:27, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Clarification of consensus issue
In this archived discussion it is claimed that, in this other archived discussion, "the consensus has been to avoid geocoding the articles until a satisfactory way to display the coordinates without cluttering the articles is found.". I wonder whether, as a participant in the latter discussion, you could kindly say whether or not that was you conclusion at its end and if so, on what grounds? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:42, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * There's a reply on User talk:Fredddie's page that you may wish to read as well. --Rschen7754 01:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Pre-RFC straw poll
There is a brief straw poll to see if conducting a RFC on the question of coordinates in road articles is worthwhile at WT:RJL. Your input would be appreciated. --Rschen7754 08:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Is the RFC something you would agree to? --Rschen7754 22:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Brizlee Tower
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Dead Man's Plack
Hudson refutes Freeman in Dead Man's Plack and an Old Thorn; I guess we shall never know the truth. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Where-geo
Where-geo may be of interest; note use on Bruce Bairnsfather. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 14:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Camphill Column, Alnwick
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
I apologise for the trouble caused. I didn't blame you but they used your name. I explain it in the Village:. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 09:36, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

M5 coordinates
Hi User:Tagishsimon,

I have undone most of the coordinates that you entered into the M5 article. I appreciate the work that you put into it, but may I refer you to the discussion at WP:RJL regarding coordinates. Basically the roads group have not come to a consensus regarding the way in which coordinatesd could be incoprorated into into road junction lists. However two points did come out of the discussions:
 * 1) There should not be a separate column for cooridinates. There was no consensus as to how they should be displayed, but the style in the M5 article (as restored by me) recevied favourable mention.
 * 2) The number of coordinates in a list should be limited.  A maximum of 10 was suggested.

I have taken what I consider to be the most important coordinats that you catalogued and worked them into the text.

Martinvl (talk) 13:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Road coordinates". Thank you. --Hasteur (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Rschen7754 00:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Keep calm is not a trade mark by scrabblicious-d4bg6y5.reduced.png.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Keep calm is not a trade mark by scrabblicious-d4bg6y5.reduced.png.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Ref Desk Miscellaneous criminal accusations
Hi, Tagishimon. I know you are a long time respected editor and am sure you were acting in good faith. But please do be aware that accusations of criminality are defamation per se. Such claims need to be referred to lawyers and prosecutors. The thread was refered to the ref desk talk page here and reported to the WP:BLPNB. Please don't restore it without consensus there. Thanks.μηδείς (talk) 02:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Reverts on UK roads
If you're going to revert, at least keep the parts of the edit that addressed other issues in the RJL table. Restoring part of a reverted edit. --Rschen7754 08:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

M23
I have undone your reversion. Please discuss on the WP:RJL page - we cannot accomodate both coordinates and miles without making a dogs dinner of the RJL. The other editor concerned is probably as adamant about miles as you are about coordinates.

Talkback
Rschen7754 15:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at M23 motorway
Hello. I am unprotecting M23 motorway per a request on my talk page so that an editor can continue to make constructive edits to this page. I am writing this to you specifically as you were involved in a recent edit war on that page (which is not related to the request on my talk page), and I'm notifying you that any edit warring whatsoever in the next 2 weeks will be met with a block. Please don't take this as a license to edit war in the future.

Please do not interpret this as me taking anyone's specific side, or as accusing any specific editor either. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Removing Brown's Law in List of Eponymous Laws
I don't disagree about the removal, as it is completely unverifiable. However, it is not silly at all, but actually quite profound if you think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.33.171 (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Umm, no. In what way would Brown's Law degrade over time? Nice try. No cigar. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Harrington Hump
I've submitted it for DYK. See Template:Did you know nominations/Harrington Hump. Simply south...... "time, department skies" for 5 years 18:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks SS. Wikipedians rock. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Predispute version
Hello, I see you reverted edits to the predispute versions of two pages: Horse Lava Tube System and Arnold Lava Tube System. It appears you have favored to make the reversion to somewhere in the middle of the dispute. Could you review your edits please? The predispute version should lie somewhere before a date of recent editing. Not in the middle of a recent edit war. Leitmotiv (talk) 19:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've taken both back to the point at which The Anomebot2 tagged them. Your edit warring started immediately after that. As you note on one of the talk pages, this business should be left until there is a decision one way or another on whether US caves have an opt-out from the wikipedia convention of tagging things. You should not jump the gun. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, if I'm not mistaken The Anomebot tagged them in April. It's December. The last edit prior to the edit war was by Leitmotiv in April. That should be your revert so it doesn't favor anyone in the edit war. By the way, I have been waiting for the decision on the cave infoboxes re: coordinates. If you had read the original discussion, you would know that the original state of the cave infobox is no coordinates! So really, it is Pigsonthewing who is jumping the gun, and not vice versa as you put it. Please, review your edits under this new information please. Thank you. Leitmotiv (talk) 18:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The meta-discussion is whether or not caves should have coordinates. Whether they're in the infobox or not is a detail. You're pushing your POV, which is fine on talk pages but not in article space. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No you're wrong. Currently, the cave infobox has no coordinate field. The UK cave infobox was made to add a coordinate field. Hence the discussion at that page. Please review your analysis. Leitmotiv (talk) 16:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said, the meta-discussion is whether or not caves should have coords or not. Coords in the infobox is an implementation detail; many caves have coords but no infobox, for example. I'm content that marking geo-locatable articles with coord missing is a de facto standard for wikipedia, one for which US caves does not, to my knowledge, have consensus to duck. I understand that you would prefer I reverted to your preferred version, but you'll forgive me if I dissent on this occasion. Better that you settle the meta-discussion than keep nagging away at this thread. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Nobody's nagging, just disagreeing sir. Sorry you feel that way. Infoboxes are designed for coordinates as you well know. I'm also sorry you chose to "dissent" from your duty to revert to a version prior to the edit war and instead do it squarely in the middle of it. You have failed your duty and have shown biased preference. Good day. Leitmotiv (talk) 02:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that you're not able to agree at which edit the war began: IMO that was your first reversion. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Harrington Hump
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

New article - Matt Hill
Hi Tagishsimon. Thanks for reviewing the new article, on | Matt Hill (CEO). Apologies on the name confusion between various Matt Hills, I was not sure how to submit a title for a new article to do that. Can I add the title 'film maker' to the new article's title, to make it 'Matt Hill (CEO/Film maker)'? and change the existing Matt Hill's article title as Matt Hill (Actor)? Thanks again, Jbro68 (talk) 02:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

New Article - Schuyler Copper Mine
Thanks for the quick response on Schuyler Copper Mine. I have added several links to this article. Zeete (talk) 12:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update for DYK. I'll update it over the weekend and get back to you. Zeete (talk) 23:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I've updated the date consistently to 1755 in the article and any links to it. I've also added more references. What do you think? Thanks. Zeete (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Dee Dee Myers
Hi Tagishsimon, I just noticed this afternoon that an editor at WikiProject Biography has reviewed the article, made some small adjustments, and encouraged me to move it over. I'm about to do so. Thanks for taking interest, though. If you have any questions later, please feel free to weigh in. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance
Hey, I really appreciate your effort, going out of your way to weigh in on a second article—especially one where I was in such a difficult spot. I can imagine how busy you must be with your own projects, so I'm very grateful for your help.

Fortunately, my experience has been that most editors understand I mean to make Wikipedia better on topics where I have a potential COI; unfortunately, Orangemike is exactly the opposite. It's been a long while since I've run into him, but if I have trouble like that in the future, I hope you'd be willing to help again. Also, I have added both Cracker Barrel and Dee Dee Myers to my list of improved articles—always was the plan, but I finally got around to it this morning.

If there was a barnstar for COI assistance, it would surely accompany this message. Maybe I should make one. Thanks again, WWB Too (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Creation
Hello Tagishsimon, and thank you for reviewing Articles for Creation submission. I noticed that you are overwriting the ts= and u= parameters with the sample review text. The ts and u parameters represent the submission's timestamp and the submitter's username. If this is overwritten, we do not know who really submitted the article, or at what time. You might be interested in this tool. It adds a review tab near the edit button and it automatically makes the review changes. Best, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  19:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  20:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Lynn Raye Harris
Hello Tagishsimon

Will external links to the Mills and Boon author site and the Harlequin author site be sufficient? NasDean (talk) 21:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NasDean (talk • contribs) 20:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Murder of Joanna Yeates
Hi. As you invited another pair of Guild eyes, I took a look. As you say, the article was well written, and I think you managed to pick up what needed picking up. Good job. I hope you won't mind that I undid your phrasing about the suicide watch. The source didn't mention the prison having any protocols, but merely said that the the staff had been told to check on him. I hope that's OK. Best, --Stfg (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Having problems with another editor
Hello there, Tagishsimon. You'd recently offered to help if I ran into trouble over my (I always intend) rule-following COI work, and I'm sorry to have to ask for your input already. I'm afraid this is the most concise, clear explanation I can give:


 * Recently, I researched and wrote a draft for a relatively modest new article about a 45-year-old trade association, the Association of Global Automakers, on their behalf, and began my engagement disclosed as such.


 * Because there was no article at the time, hence no Talk page to begin this outreach, I took it to WikiProject Automobiles on November 21, where I received feedback from two editors (User:Charles01 and User:Mr.choppers), whose to the extent I was able. Although Mr.choppers expressed some dissatisfaction with my effort, he also agreed it passed WP:NOTE and said he would have no further comment.


 * Assuming this was good enough, on December 21, I moved the article from my userspace into the mainspace, left a note of disclosure with a link back to the WikiProject Autos discussion, and figured that was it.


 * The next day, another member of WikiProject Autos (User:Jenova20) added 4 warning tags to the article, which currently remain. I asked him for a better explanation of the warnings, and presented my view as to why they weren't necessary, first on his page and then on the Global Automakers Talk page. I let the matter go over Christmas weekend, but Jenova20 has not been active since December 23.


 * On December 28, the Global Automakers discussion page attracted the attention of two different editors, User:Biker Biker and User:Scheinwerfermann. Biker Biker at least, but hasn't said what would need to be fixed in order to for the tags to be resolved.


 * Scheinwerfermann is a bit of a different story: he has spent a lot of time lecturing me in general terms about COI and his unspecified disapproval of the article, but I think by now it's very clear he doesn't want to help make the article better, he just wants to frustrate my efforts. Although I've remained as carefully polite as he has not, I am just about done assuming good faith on his part. (He's even just on his Talk page, so I am further vexed.) Looking at his edit history, it seems that his general M.O. includes  even toward . I wouldn't say he's threatening me per se, but it seems like he's going in that direction.


 * Scheinwerfermann aside, my principal frustration is that I have asked multiple editors for addressable feedback, and nothing has recently been forthcoming. At WikiProject Automobiles, I fielded some suggestions from Mr.choppers about what sort of critical information should be included; for the handful of suggestions, I found no third-party sources, and sought to show my work. No one else has offered anything concrete, and my requests have been met with accusations of rushing.


 * For your convenience, the two most important threads are Association of Global Automakers, proposed article review request at WikiProject Automobiles and Bias tags on the Global Automakers discussion page. They are getting a bit long, but they're at least fairly self-contained.

At this point, I think the only way forward is to bring in new perspectives. You came to mind first, but I'm not trying to forum-shop, merely to widen this discussion to include some fair-minded, solution-oriented editors. I would understand if you didn't want to get involved personally, but I really could use some outside advice on how to proceed. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for your comments, particularly on Jimbo's page. Very gratifying, considering the recent headaches. Ironically, I now think the NPOV template is warranted, at least on the Advocacy and lobbying section as Scheinwerfermann has reworked it. Among other problems, the Safety standards sub-section is a particularly absurd bit of original research, based on a strange extrapolation from the source he's provided. At the risk of pushing my luck, I'll probably write a concise summary for the Talk page this coming week, and see how that goes. Thanks again, WWB Too (talk) 19:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Hello. There is currently a discussion at ANI regarding a matter in which you have been involved. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 04:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

A New Year for the DNB, and launch of "volume of the month"
See WT:WP DNB for a collaboration that I'm in the course of setting up. Everyone who signed up to the WikiProject for the Dictionary of National Biography is being notified, while there is still time to alter the way of working if need be. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Please ignore - posted in error. Jamespels (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Star Party and Peak Star Party website
Hi Tagishsimon,

thanks for the helpful feedback on the PSP page - much appreciated. Hopefully the latest version explains why it is a notable event (even if quite small, it is surprisingly high impact in the rural Peak District!).

Also, you comment on the Star Party page that you will keep the "Peak Star Party" link red, but the entire sentence I added appears to have been deleted. Was this intentional - if so, can you explain why please?

Thanks again,

James.

Jamespels (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Peak Star Party page
Hi again,

just thought - this may need another page describing what PDDS is - it isn't a local astro society but a regional charity incorporating about 8 societies in the region with support from the Peak District National Park Authority and Nottingham Trent University. We haven't registered with the Charities Commission yet but have met all the criteria (turnover, etc.) and will do so as soon as we have agreed the Trustees and the final remit, etc. We also need to formalise the links we are building with Manchester, Sheffield, Nottingham and Keele Universities to really get the education side of things fully supported.

I was planning on getting all of this sorted out before adding to Wikipedia but can sort out at least an outline page early on if necessary.

Thanks,

James.

Jamespels (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Cooperation
I just recently started Wikiproject Cooperation and I thought you would be interested. Thanks for your time. Silver seren C 00:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:M11 Google Example.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:M11 Google Example.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Responding to Your message about Proposal on Geotagging
Got your message and in response I have looked at the proposal about geotagging and voted to oppose. This is the first I had heard about it. These Wiki-disputes are amazingly wrong-headed. Thanks for the alert. --Mdukas (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey. Just letting you know that this is blatant canvassing and will be dealt with accordingly, as some of your project members even called you out on. --Rschen7754 19:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Saw your note about kml files for items such as highways. I guess the good thing about a single point of data is that many online maps can place that point. In that way, depending on the map, you could tell if a lighthouse was near water, if Stonehenge is on a hill, or what kind of soil lies under the leaning tower of Pisa. What seems more important is a common interface to maps than having the "best" solution for a wikipedia page. Anyway, thank you very much for letting me know that other people are thinking about this. Fotoguzzi (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Rschen7754 19:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, Tagishsimon. Just in response to this request. I tend to agree with Rschen7754 (and with Imzadi1979 on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways). Sometimes we all get a rush of blood to the head but contacting so many editors in such a way can make a bad situation worse. Contacting interested users is fine but posting to the talk pages of up on 150 users is excessive. Notice was already posted to WikiProject Geographical coordinates and at Centralized discussion since December 26. Regards, -- RA (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways‎. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Whilst I tend to agree with your arguments, you could really have shot yourself in the foot with this. Bazonka (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You appear to have posted to 125 user talk pages on this, making it probably the largest scale case of canvassing I have ever seen. Make sure you don't make the same mistake again: you could well have been blocked for this. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * In almost 7 years of editing Wikipedia, this is the single worst incidence of canvassing I have ever seen. --Rschen7754 18:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I know i'm stopping by a little late, but as the closing admin on this RfC, I also have to say that I found it disruptive to the RfC. Now, I understand this is about two weeks done, but this should be your only warning for this. As JamesBWatson said, and i'm saying now, learn from our missteps and move on. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  18:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:M11 Google Example.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:M11 Google Example.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rschen7754 00:02, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * As an involved admin in an ongoing dispute you should not have involved yourself in this matter. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Which is why I referred it to another admin, especially considering that I don't feel comfortable with anything images: User_talk:Fastily/Archive_5 --Rschen7754 00:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:Yeates co-ordinates
Hi, I was told at the FAC that it needs a couple of tweaks, notably using en-dash to separate Home and 44, and also to ensure the table is accessible using row and col scopes. I read through MOS:DTT, but because of the software I use it's a bit problematic. If you can sort it out then by all means pop it back in as I do think it's a useful thing to have. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * cheers, that's much appreciated. :) Paul MacDermott (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Yeates
ok, I'll take a look a bit later. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 21:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the copyedit and suggestions, I'll do some more work on it over the weekend. Paul MacDermott (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Unique Identifiers
I have created WikiProject Unique Identifiers for discussion and coordination of all UID related matters. Please join! (Feel free to list yourself as a founder.) Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Coey
I just wanted to thank you for taking the initiative on the Coey article: I honestly didn't mean for it to be biased, but on reflection I can see that the positive quotations were rather overwhelming and a bit of balance was needed. It looks much better now – thank you again. —Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 21:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I've had problems with this in several other articles I have written on the Rhodesian Bush War and people involved in it. The description I gave above, which you quoted, is more or less what I have settled on as a neutral description of it in several other articles. I am sure you will agree it is more neutral than the alternatives I have seen other editors produce, which typically include numerous misspellings, refer to the guerrillas as "freedom fighters" and to the Rhodesian government as an "apartheid-style régime", or similar. That may be the point of view of some people, but it is not neutral by any stretch of the imagination. "Guerrillas" is a neutral term, the fighters in question did profess communist ideologies (I will expand on this later), and their aim was to overthrow the government and introduce majority rule by force: whether or not they were justified in doing so is another matter, but even if you agree with their attempting to do so you cannot deny that it was a forcible act, and they were attempting to topple the incumbent administration. If the war was truly only about universal suffrage, then it is a mystery why it continued for a year after fully-inclusive elections were held in 1979 following the Internal Settlement between the government and non-combatant nationalist parties (albeit, in practice, the elections were largely segregated: those who qualified on the pre-1979 "A" roll, which was almost entirely white, voted separately. However, including all races the election drew a turnout of about 65% if my memory serves. Because ZANU and ZAPU boycotted it the UN damned it as a "sham").


 * I said earlier I would come back to the communist ideologies of the two militant parties, so here we are. I am surprised that the Wikipedia articles on ZANLA, ZANU, ZIPRA and ZAPU do not mention communism, as both of the parties were Marxist by their own account (Chinese-aligned in the case of ZANU–ZANLA, and Warsaw Pact in the case of ZAPU–ZIPRA). They both announced their intention to form a one-party communist state on their respective foundations in the early 1960s (ZANU coming later, as it was originally a splinter group from ZAPU). I have given one of ZANU's "chimurenga war communiqués" as a reference in quite a few places, including here; the document starts by describing the war as a "revolutionary drive to eliminate settler oppression, imperialism and capitalism" and continues in a similar vein. Both ZANLA and ZIPRA cadres were trained on extended courses in the USSR, China, North Korea, Cuba and so on, and particularly in ZIPRA's case actually had Warsaw Pact advisors with them in Zambia, training a conventional-style army for a potential invasion (which never happened). ZANLA's cap badge was a red star, while ZIPRA's was the hammer and sickle. Interestingly, even though modern Zimbabwe has moved away from this path somewhat, it retains the term "comrade" as a legacy of the war: "comrade" was the term of address for guerrilla fighters from both ZANLA and ZIPRA whilst in the field, as well as the title given to members of each party. When they attended political conferences and so forth, they did so as "Cde. Robert Mugabe", "Cde. Enos Nkala" and so forth (see Geneva Conference (1976), for example). The governing ZANU–PF party (which was created by ZANU absorbing the weakened ZAPU in 1987) actually still retains "comrade" as the honorary prefix for each of its members. At election time the posters still order ask you to vote for "Cde. Robert Mugabe".


 * In short, I don't think the description of the war which is presently given is unfair. The guerrilla armies were communist-backed, communist-trained and advertised the fact that they were communists themselves. I think if we were viewing the war through Coey's eyes the description would be far more extreme: for a start it would refer to the fighters as "terrorists", not guerrillas. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—<b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 22:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * When I find the time I will have a whack through the ZANU, ZAPU, ZANLA and ZIPRA articles and remedy this. As far as the Victoria Falls freight train goes, I think you have just demonstrated yourself that the Rhodesian situation is far more complicated than most people understand – which is precisely what makes it so interesting and so important to record properly.


 * Feel free to drop me a line another time if there's any way I can help you out with anything. Thanks again for helping with Coey. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—<b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 22:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject invite
Hi there, Tagishsimon—it's been a little while since I said hello, and thanks again for your help recently. Not sure if you've seen Cracker Barrel lately, but it's much better: a few independent editors helped to rescue it, and I worked with them to bring it to GA status. Alas, Global Automakers remains in disarray, tagged, and now abandoned; one of these days I'll get back to it, but for now I've moved on to other projects.

Anyhow, the real reason I'm writing is invite you (again, I just noticed you were invited early on) to WikiProject Cooperation. These are the folks who helped with Cracker Barrel, and the whole concept is to provide a safe harbor for COI editors to make requests and propose changes—like COI/N, but without the presumption of guilt, one might say. It's had some good early momentum and new members steadily trickling in, but it could always use more. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Some cropping action
-- Jenith  (talk) 02:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Crop the black background
-- Jenith  (talk) 04:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Crop the red background
-- Jenith  (talk) 04:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Crop the frames
-- Jenith  (talk) 04:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

More acid eaten paper part 5
 Jenith  (talk) 03:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

More acid eaten paper part 7 - the end
-- Jenith  (talk) 09:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)