User talk:TaiXuan91

Your submission at Articles for creation: GNU Moe (April 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GNU Moe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:GNU_Moe Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pbritti&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:GNU_Moe reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia's complex pages confuse me a little, so I sent this message a few times in different ways to make sure you could see it.
 * The reasons for rejection are ridiculous. GNU Moe is software. I quoted GNU Moe's official website in reference. There are detailed software documents and source code download addresses on its official website. I don't know what is more reliable source than the official website for a software.
 * Judging from the reviewer's personal homepage, the reviewer's professional field is history. And this is a software entry. Giving empty, unconstructive comments on articles in a different field is a very poor review response.
 * I don't think the reviewer would like his history paper to be sent to a physicist for review. Not to mention the opinion of physicists is to add more mathematical formulas. TaiXuan91 (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I would encourage you to consider reviewing Wikipedia's policies and guidelines a bit more, many of which are accessible from this page. One very useful page for you might be this one on writing your first article. Please refrain from personal diatribes; see Wikipedia's civility policy here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)