User talk:Tai kit

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! &middot;  j e r s y k o   talk  &middot; 14:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Eton
Please stop changing the classification of Eton College as a public school; it is the most famous school under this category. If you believe this label needs to be debated, please do so at Talk:Eton College. Otherwise, you may be temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Harr o 5 06:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Is the Dragon no longer a prep school?
I thought the term prep school was still current. Could the Dragon not be a prep school and independent? Jpaulm 02:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Naparima College
Regarding this edit: the independent school article describes an independent school as "a school which is not dependent upon national or local government for financing its operation and is instead operated by tuition charges, gifts, and in some cases the investment yield of an endowment." On what basis do you believe that this applies to this school? Guettarda 18:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Barack Obama
Please stop characterizing Obama's high school as "exclusive private." That may well be the case, but in order to make characterizations such as these, reliable sources must be provided as references in the article text. In any event, the proper place for that type of information is most likely in the article on the school, not articles on persons that happen to have attended it. · j e r s y k o talk · 14:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

LocationFree
What is this license of which you speak? I am a long-time PSP user and I have no idea what you mean, so many others may be similarly confused. Please explain in article. Thanks. 86.17.211.191 22:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Couch (Korean punk rock band)
A tag has been placed on Couch (Korean punk rock band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. chiefhuggybear (talk) 04:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Heroes Article
Hello

I appreciate your enthusiasm for the BBC information on the HEROES page, however, all content added to wikipedia needs to be presented at high standards. Please make sure that anytime you add new information to the HEROES page or any page, that you provide a verified source from a verified reference. Your information on HEROES airing in the UK is very informative, however, it has no sources to prove that what you are saying is correct. If you want to add information, it should be sourced. Also, remember that wikipedia is presenting an entire scope of the series. HEROES is an American Television series, so it is not important to add detailed information about it airings in every country around the world. If we added detailed information about HEROES airings in every country in the world, the HEROES article would be too long to contain. It is not necessary to add information to the HEROES page about the detailed airings of HEROES in the UK. I have provided a brief summary on the main page that is substantial for this encyclopedia. If you have any questions, need advice or mentoring on how to use wikipedia, please feel free to write me back. Reliable sources must be provided as references in the article text. I reverted your edits. Please do not take them personally, but rather, consider the entire scope of the HEROES series, rather than just what is happening on the BBC. Thanks...CHEERS!-- ChrisisinChrist  comments and complaints here! 00:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Seb Clover
In this edit a while back you added that he was educated at a certain school. Can you tell me where you got that information from? - Mgm|(talk) 23:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC

Yes, certainly. It was named on both BBC News and by ITN (Independent Television News), which both featured reports in which Clover's school colleagues at Ryde School were interviewed in the classrooms, on Clover's first day back at school. Tai kit (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Tai Kit

British vs English
Please don't change people's nationalities from English to British. Respect how the article was originally written. People have very strong and opposing views on this topic and you should not impose your own view by changing established articles. Take a look at Nationality of people from the United Kingdom, which might explain why articles should be left alone. --TimTay (talk) 10:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Westminster School
Please stop changing the classification of Westminster School as a public school; it is one of the original public schools under the Public Schools Act 1868 and falls under this category. If you believe this label needs to be debated, please do so at Talk:Westminster School. Tmwerty (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, you changed it again. I've told my reasons for its labelling, and I can see that the term public school can cause problems, but it is linked to page that explains it and I will change it back. If you disagree, please leave a message on me talk page; I don't want to start an edit war. Tmwerty (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Malvern College
Hi ! Malvern College is an article you have edited or contributed to concerns an important school. It still needs some urgent  attention. If you can help, please see Talk:Malvern College  regarding  how it  may  be improved. --Kudpung (talk) 08:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Changes to UK school infoboxes
Hi, I see you've been changing the country field of this infobox in several schools to United Kingdom. However according to the documentation for template:infobox UK school this should be the constituent country (England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland). Also, adding "pupils" or "students" after the enrollment field yields the redundant display "Students 500 pupils". Kanguole 11:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Please Stop doing this.Motmit (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sunny Chan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. _LDS (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Price (actor)
A tag has been placed on Thomas Price (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Thomas Price (actor)
I have nominated Thomas Price (actor), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Thomas Price (actor). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  ttonyb (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Capitals in names
Hi, I see that you have capitalized Chinese names in a number of articles. Please do not capitalize these. See WP:NC-CHINA on how names should be written. Do revert all these name changes as soon as possible. Thank you. -- S Masters (talk) 04:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Tai kit, Thanks for reverting all these. Much appreciated, and keep up the good work. :-) -- S Masters (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Simon King
Please stop editing Simon Kings page reference his education. He never has attended Wells Cathedral school, despite the wrong information on certain sites, They have been told to remove this false information. — [ Unsigned comment added by Smileeej (talk • contribs) 11:20, 25 April 2010.]


 * Says who? There are clearly published sources showing that King attended Wells Cathedral school. Where are your sources/proof that he did not? --Simple Bob (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Genitals
Hello, I've noticed in a few articles that you have gone into great detail about actors' gentials in nude scenes, for example: "with his pubic hair, testicles and circumcised penis fully exposed" in Cold Showers. We don't really need this much information in an encyclopedia article, unless you can show that there is coverage of this in reliable sources. It is enough to mention a nude scene, if that is notable; even nude scenes do not always need to be mentioned.-- Beloved Freak  11:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. It would be very helpful if you could summarise your contributions. Simple Bob (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Countries vs. Kingdoms
The Kingdom of Scotland and the Kingdom of England both ceased to exist in 1707, when their parliaments voted to unite to form the Kingdom of Great Britain (which subsequently became the United Kingdom.

Scotland and England are countries. They haven't been kingdoms for several centuries.

Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 19:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

David Cameron
Any danger you could wait until the Queen offers Cameron the job, before saying that Cameron is PM? I'm going to Spain for me Summer hols this year - it doesn't mean I'm in Spain right now.

Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 19:27, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Nudity in film. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Beloved Freak  19:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Daniel Radcliffe. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to City Without Baseball. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Beloved Freak  20:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

City Without Baseball
I have started a discussion at Talk:City Without Baseball that involves you, and you may want to participate. Thanks, -- Beloved Freak  09:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Tai kit for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 05:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * After looking at the SPI case above, I believe you have clearly used the mentioned IP addresses to engage in edit warring on City Without Baseball. If you do anything like this again, you will have your editing privileges revoked; this is your first and only warning for this. Regards, –MuZemike 02:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your remarks. As I have made clear in the User Talk section of 'City Without Baseball', I don't know anyone in Thailand, from where those edits to my Wikipedia page allegedly originated, and have neither the time, technical ability nor the inclination to somehow manipulate the accounts of other users in other countries, or to vandalise my own work. I think it would be better if you were to devote your time to finding and warning those responsible for damaging my work, rather than needlessly tarnishing the reputation of an established user with groundless allegations. I believe I deserve an apology from you, and hope to receive one, once your allegations are proven to be entirely false. Tai kit (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Tai Kit

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries again
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Redruth. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Hi. You are a fellow established WP editor, who should know that Edit summaries are part of consensus. Another editor asked you to supply them, back in April, but was ignored. Wikipedia relies on wp:consensus, and our all adhering to its guidelines.

One such is wp:ES. Please could you either adhere to it, or state why the consensus doesn't apply in your case.

I note that you've sought to defend your reputation on other matters. I'm glad that you value others' collective opinions.

May I leave you with this thought - for now: I would be happy to have your thoughts on ESs, & to discuss this issue with you, here. Trafford09 (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Trafford09,


 * Thank you very much for your remarks and useful insights. I always value others' contributions, both collectively and individually. I must apologise for having misunderstood one of the aspects of the editing process: I hadn't realised that it was always obligatory to provide a reason for editing, and had understood that whilst it was certainly preferable if, for example, the reason for the editing was unclear, it wasn't always necessary, especially if the editing was comparatively minor. However, I shall try to remember to do so for future edits. But I certainly haven't deliberately 'ignored' an Editor's request to supply them, as you put it, and as I really can't remember having seen one, I think that if I had noticed it at the time, I must have promptly forgotten it. I shall look back through many pages to try to find it, and then to respond to him/her. I really appreciate your having brought this to my attention, and for having taken the time and trouble to do so.


 * However, I think we shouldn't assume the 'bad faith' of another member here, which is implied in some of your remarks, unless we have definitive proof of malicious intent. There needs to be the presumption of human fallibility in such cases, of honest misunderstanding and the desire to do the 'right thing'. Incidentally, I don't think I had realised that the granting of the status of a Reviewer was the same as that of a fully-fledged WP Editor. I shall read the rules again, this time more closely than before, and endeavour to remember to apply all of them for future edits.


 * Thanks again for your feedback.


 * Yours, T.C. Tai kit (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Tai Kit

Hi TC. Thanks for the prompt reply - appreciated. I'm glad you don't mind discussing ESs. I always try to wp:AGF, and had not forsaken good faith with you - sorry if I gave that impression - indeed I hoped you would respond. To save you trouble looking up the prior concern which as I said was from April, here it is. Not that that matters - it's just history, if you hadn't seen it at the time, and you're happy to follow the guideline.

BTW, I think we editors all essentially enjoy the same standing, admins. apart I suppose (of whom I'm not one).

As for ESs, well they help vandal-patrollers a lot, and needn't of course be long, just a "+cat" or "c-e" & indeed we registered users also have the 'minor' flag at our disposal. When patrollers see an ES or minor flag ticked, they don't need to open and check each edit for authenticity, you see. I'm sure with your elegance of words you'd have no trouble in thinking up concise ESs.

Thank you for your understanding, and happy editing. Trafford09 (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

my name is tai kit
enough about city about baseball thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.227.89 (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I have not added anything at all about 'City Without Baseball' for months, and the edits by 81.64.32.154 are by someone who is falsely claiming to be me. Not impressed. Tai kit (talk) Tai Kit

Revived interest in Infernal Affairs
Invitation to participate in the poll for Infernal Affairs.

From your edits for the film Infernal Affairs there is presently a poll taking place on The Departed film Talk page regarding whether you believe a separate subsection should be included for (a) Infernal Affairs as a source for the plot of The Departed film, and/or (b) a second subsection for the recently captured crime figure Whitey Bulger as the source for the character played by Jack Nicholson in the film.

The recent capture of Bulger has revived the question from two years ago of Infernal Affairs from when it did have a separate subsection on The Departed film page which was deleted by User:RepublicanJ, now known as User:OldJ. Invite to visit The Departed Talk page, to the Bulger section at the end of the Page, to participate in the Poll currently taking place. 208.120.96.227 (talk) 11:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Your recent editing history at Battle of the Somme shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 08:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Move reverted.
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of Star Appeal has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion. Please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested. bd2412 T 14:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Byron Pang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock On (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Speechless (2012 film)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Speechless (2012 film), Tai kit!

Wikipedia editor Moonchïld9 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"If possible, add references to cast"

To reply, leave a comment on Moonchïld9's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Request for comment
As someone who has edited the article Asian American this year, I am seeking your input on a proposed change to remove a reference to epicanthic eyefolds. This topic has prompted discussion in 2009, 2010 and most recently in 2013.

There's a fine line between being WP:BOLD and subverting WP:CONSENSUS. Given the history of this topic, I'm hoping that a robust discussion, for the record, would improve the article whether this reference stays or goes. Ishu (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Glue (TV series) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=655914651 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F655914651%7CGlue (TV series)%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Beijing Queer Film Festival
Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Tai kit, thanks for creating Beijing Queer Film Festival!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Terms such as "precious film archives" and so forth undermine neutrality of any article when there is no reason to use them. That, coupled with only two sources, brings the neutrality of the article into question.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. S immons Talk 06:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Beijing Queer Film Festival
Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Tai kit, thanks for creating Beijing Queer Film Festival!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please don't delete the tags I add before discussing with me. Thank you. I'm adding a different tag that I feel is a bit more reasonable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. S immons Talk 18:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rasimmons, thanks for your messages! Sorry that I ran out of time to reply to you early today, after making many changes. I'll leave comments for you on your User talk:Rasimmons page. Tai kit (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

IFVA
Hallo, when you created the article Ifva: Incubator for Film and Visual media in Asia you may not have noticed that we already had an article IFVA on the same subject. I've converted your article into a redirect to the existing one, but you might want to work on it to expand it. Thanks. Pam D  17:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

No Regret (film)
Hi, in 2009 you added that it is "the first commercially-released South Korean film to feature full-frontal adult male nudity"; in 2014 you cahnged it by adding "although no genitals are shown". Altough I think that "full-frontal nudity" is contradcitory to "no genitals are shown", my point is somewhere else: the 2009 edit changed the sentence in a way that made it look as though info you added was present in the source mentioned previously. That is Vandalism, so:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at No Regret (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --WikiHannibal (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. No, I'm sure it wasn't vandalism - I think I would have forgotten to add the source. As you say, the edit was in 2009, which was seven years ago. It's a pity that you seem to assume bad faith - to purposefully break a rule - rather than someone making an honest mistake. Tai kit (talk) 00:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Tai kit

Margaret Rutherford at RADA
Hello! I'm working on RADA alumni right now and I have a problem with Margaret Rutherford who is categorised as such. I saw you were the one to add she studied there back in 2008 but you gave no reference then. The information was removed in 2011 again without explanation, but the category stayed. And now I have someone in the category which I can't find information on the RADA website. So if you can give me a reference, it would be great! Either she was listed there under a pseudonym (she wouldn't be the first or the only one), or you made an old error (in which case, I can just remove the category and correct Wikidata) or something. Thank you! --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 03:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Inappropriate Summaries
"The film tells the story of a young Thai man, Ake (played by Thai actor Phakpoom Surapongsanuruk), who is bed-ridden and paralysed from the waist down. He gradually becomes sexually attracted by the gentle stroking administered by his male nurse, Pun, during washing and changing. The Thai female director, Anocha Suwichakornpong, states that the actor's stark nudity is intended to shock, as it is important to the exposition of the story. As a result, a later scene in a bath full of clear water reveals the young man's private area in unexpected detail, through the use of a sharply-focussed overhead camera. The detail, such as the clear view of his testicles and of the foreskin of his penis, which is rolled all the way back to fully reveal his uncovered glans head, emphasises his nakedness and vulnerability. His exposed pubic hair, penis and testicles rise slightly in the water. He is then shown in unflinching detail repeatedly trying to masturbate, by rubbing, stroking and playing with his penis, briefly unfurling his foreskin and sliding it up and down over his glans head, but his penis still fails to become erect. It is the first Thai film to have received the country's most restrictive viewing rating, due to this scene."

This is WAY too graphic, and offers no encyclopedic merit at all. Not only is it riddled with spelling errors but the level of detail is not okay. You need to stop this. --Tarage (talk) 02:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Tarage (talk). I'm so sorry. On reflection, I realise you're right and I accept the points you've made and the view you take. If you could please just separately answer where you believe the descriptions were "riddled with spelling errors", because that's one issue of which I was/am genuinely unaware. I know that I have indeed made several spelling errors, but I tend to review my work quite thoroughly and edit and re-edit as I go along, in order to correct mistakes (incl. spelling errors). Please do note, though, that if you're from the US, or use US spelling, I'm not American and therefore don't use US spelling. I know this issue is a much smaller point, though, and other than that, I do totally accept your wider criticism. Please see my reply to both you and Daniel Carrero (talk) below. Thanks - Tai kit (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree with Tarage. I reviewed all of Tai kit's recent additions to List of films with LGBT characters and edited out these graphic pieces of text. See my edit summaries in the article history for details.
 * Tai kit, it would be better to stick to just answering the question: "How is a character LGBT?" For example by mentioning if the character has shown to have same-sex relationships or attraction. Case in point: I would think a bisexual claim at least needs notes showing how is a character attracted to both sexes. Some of your bisexual claims in the article seem insufficiently explained, so I added "citation needed" in these cases.
 * It goes without saying that straight characters can appear naked in films, so being naked doesn't serve at all as evidence to the claim that someone is LGBT. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Reply to Tarage (talk) and Daniel Carrero (talk): OK guys, I'm really sorry about that. On reflection, I think you're absolutely right. And thanks for the clear steer you've both given. I had thought graphic content was generally OK but only in this type of article and intended viewership, as long as the description was a) truthful and b) not derogatory. But I now accept that I was mistaken in my view. I do also accept that I spent far too little time in answering the question: "How is a character LGBT?". The evidence is there, as I have already found, and I should therefore have devoted more attention to presenting it. I'll do my best to do that before inserting more entries. You've both done the right thing in drawing this to my attention and editing out that unnecessary content, as I now realise. Again, my apologies and thanks to you both. All the best, Tai kit (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Your reviews are awesome. 2601:152:307:1DED:F81E:384F:83D6:C252 (talk) 00:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Film festivals
Please familiarize yourself with our rules about duplicate categorization. Namely, is not needed as a category on any film festival that's already in  or  or  — since all of those "in X" categories are already subcategories of the general category, a film festival being included in them is already placing them in the general category's tree, so a film festival does not need to be filed in both the general category and the more specific one at the same time, but goes only in the more specific category. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I am the real T'ai Kit.
Good day. 93.22.133.166 (talk) 21:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Inaprapriote summaries
I sorry is so graphic. I bad. 93.22.133.166 (talk) 21:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Anmafinotera
Hello 93.22.133.166 (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)