User talk:Taimour sheikh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadayat & Co. (November 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hadayat & Co. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hadayat_%26_Co. Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hadayat_%26_Co. reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello Taimour sheikh. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Hadayat & Co., gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Taimour sheikh. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Taimour sheikh, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I think you attempted to declare a paid relationship, but you used the incorrect template(one for article talk pages). Please follow the instructions in the message above. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi I tried to declared this on my user page before even writing the article but I don't know why it wasn't confirmed maybe my template wasn't correct. However, I have tried again to disclose it. I am actually not directly paid by the organization to contribute to Wikipedia but I am employed in the company. So please tell me will this article be eligible or should I stop trying? Taimour sheikh (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I fixed your disclosure, you had wikicoding in place(probably inadvertently) to suppress its proper display. Employment counts as paid editing, so you have now made the proper disclosure.
 * Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell about themselves and what they do. Wikipedia articles about companies must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.
 * What are your top three independent reliable sources with significant coverage of your company? These should not be your own company website, staff interviews, press releases, mere announcements of activities, brief mentions, or any other materials put out by the company. 331dot (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for fixing this issue. You've been a great help. Here are my top 3 reliable sources:
 * https://www.urdupoint.com/business/directory/detail/hadayat-co-111856.html
 * https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.hadayat__sons.52f1c59a8200db742a0468f79087a05d.html
 * https://www.signalhire.com/companies/hadayat-sons Taimour sheikh (talk) 10:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * These three are all directory-type listings, which are not significant coverage of the topic(and often are based on information provided by the company).  If these are your three best sources, your company does not merit a Wikipedia article at this time.  What is needed are independent sources like news reports that go into detail on their own, not based on materials from the company, about what makes a company important/significant/influential as they see it.  Ford Motor Company merits an article not because it exists and manufactures cars for sale, but because independent reliable sources have written extensively about Ford and its influence on manufacturing as well as American society as a whole. It doesn't contain what Ford considers to be its own history, but what others say is its history.  Microsoft is another example of a good article about a company.
 * If independent sources on their own recognize your company as particularly influential or important and write about it, that's what we need summarized. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarification. I'll look into finding better resources. Taimour sheikh (talk) 05:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hadayat & Co.


A tag has been placed on Draft:Hadayat & Co., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadayat & Co. (December 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hadayat & Co. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hadayat_%26_Co. Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hadayat_%26_Co. reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hadayat & Co.


A tag has been placed on Draft:Hadayat & Co., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)