User talk:Taipingian303

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaz Zairil Abdul Jamil
Hello Taipingian303,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jaz Zairil Abdul Jamil for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arbustum (talk) 18:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaz Zairil Abdul Jamil


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jaz Zairil Abdul Jamil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Arbustum (talk) 18:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaz Zairil Abdul Jamil


A tag has been placed on Jaz Zairil Abdul Jamil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 04:54, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taiping Mall
Hello Taipingian303,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Taiping Mall for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —Swpbtalk 16:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Warning
Do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. The tag makes clear that this is inappropriate. You can challenge the deletion on the article talk page if you want, and an administrator will decide if you've sufficiently addressed the problems raised. I see you've had a number or articles deleted in the past — now might be a good time to learn about our article policies, so you can stop wasting everyone's time (ours and yours). —Swpbtalk 16:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)