User talk:Takahiro0930

Welcome!
Hello, Takahiro0930, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 05:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nagamitsu Osafune


The article Nagamitsu Osafune has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No WP:Sourcing given.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nagamitsu Osafune (December 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nagamitsu Osafune and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nagamitsu Osafune (December 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nagamitsu Osafune and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Draft:Nagamitsu Osafune
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Nagamitsu Osafune, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.shibuiswords.com/bizennagamitsu.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Nagamitsu Osafune and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Draft:Nagamitsu Osafune, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Nagamitsu Osafune. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Nagamitsu Osafune with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Draft talk:Nagamitsu Osafune saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Adam9007 (talk) 01:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

If you continue to post content copied from other sources to Wikipedia, as you have done at Osafune Nagamitsu, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned about copyright infringement, and have had an article deleted because of copyright concerns, so you must be aware that copying content from another source is unacceptable, and yet you have done so again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent copyright infringements. For the present, the block is for one week, but if you continue to post content copied from elsewhere to Wikipedia after the block ends you may expect an indefinite block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing with the same copyright infringement that led to the earlier block. The page Draft talk:Nagamitsu Osafune/Temp, which you created, consisted largely of content which has already been published at http://xxxdoragon2.cheap.jp/wp/?p=18393. I also see that when you created that page, you gave the edit summary "I made sure there was no copy from other sources." You must have been aware that in fact the content you were posting was a copy of what appeared elsewhere, making your statement in that edit summary appear disingenuous. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)