User talk:Talia679

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -  BanyanTree 15:56, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Proposed deletion of Cephalonian method
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cephalonian method, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Orphaned article, does not establish notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tomdobb (talk) 16:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Talia679! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Anita Shreve -

Speedy deletion nomination of ByWater Solutions LLC


A tag has been placed on ByWater Solutions LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

by water solutions deletion
I do not have the ability to restore pages, you would need to ask an administrator. The administrator who deleted your page was NawlinWiki, you might want to talk to them. The "button" was there from the time the page was nominated for deletion, until it was deleted.

If you ask the admin the page can be "userfied" so that you can edit it further before making it a "real" page. However, once it is a real page again, it may be subject to deletion. Make sure you read and understand WP:N and WP:CORP, as well as WP:RS. If your article does not establish notability via reliable sources, it will likely get deleted again. Please understand that "not notable" does not mean "not important". Something can be important, and yet not be notable (because it has not been "noted" by newspapers and magazines).

Your response to that might be "what about those other pages I mentioned". Either they are more notable, or they slipped through the cracks, if someone notices, they could get deleted in the future too if they do not meet the criteria. In anycase WP:OTHERSTUFF

Also please read and understand WP:COI as it seems you may have a relationship with this entitiy, which risks WP:POV issues.

Let me know if you have more questions. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for replying. The page was actually deleted almost immediately and never had the button in question because I spent nearly 30 minutes trying to figure out how to contest the deletion. I did post on the talk wall for the person who deleted it on Friday but have gotten no response so when I saw your comment on my talk page I thought I'd ask you.  As for 'notability' I had added at least 15 citations to the page to prove its notability including references to outside journals and papers. I didn't have much time to work on the page - like I said it was deleted almost immediately so I didn't get to clean it all up and organize it, but the data was all there and I'd hate to start fresh. I guess I will wait to see if the administrator who did the deleting every replies to me. If you have any other way to contact him or other admins who might be able to nudge him I'd appreciate it. Talia 18:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * You can post to one of the administrator noticeboards, Requests_for_undeletion seems like a good choice in this case. Articles which are not in a good "initial" state, are likely to be deleted quickly. It is best to work on articles offline, or in user-space to get them complete before creating them for real. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Koha-logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Koha-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ChickTech


A tag has been placed on ChickTech, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Talia679. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
– Athaenara ✉  11:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Information Today


The article Information Today has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional article. Cited only to primary-sourced directory information - no RS coverage. A WP:BEFORE shows no third-party RS coverage of the company that I could find - plenty of uses of the words 'information today' and several other companies of the same name. I could be wrong, but it would be need to be shown with clear third-party RS coverage meeting WP:CORPDEPTH."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 19:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Information Today for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Information Today is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Information Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 11:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)