User talk:Taliazapata/sandbox

Evaluating an article
Bachelorette Everything in the article, Bachelorette, is relevant to the topic discussed. Although the article is relatively short. I believe the article has room for improvement and content. Two of the five links do not work. The article is part of the wikiproject Biography and could use a picture if possible. The article does not seem to be biased or one-sided. Taliazapata (talk) 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC) Talia Zapata

Peer Review
I thought the content you gave from that source was really good, but you still need to include two other sources and main points from each of them. Tyjhuff (talk) 05:43, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Your sources look relevant and the content is very interesting. Maybe move the sentence talking about one of the lies of WhatsApp to after the first sentence. This could help with the flow. If there are more rumors spreading through WhatsApp it would be interesting to see those. Also, it would be good to explain what paramilitary means.Hannah171501 (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft Feedback
Talia, you've gotten good feedback from your peers, and you should consider making changes they suggest. I think this new section will improve the WP article greatly. Good work. JAirhart 20:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs)