User talk:TalibDbouk

May 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Respiratory droplet, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit of "Respiratory Droplet" page Rejected !
Dear Editors.

We uploaded the text below to edit the wikipedia page "Respiratory Droplet" that was modified by you and then rejected. Our text below is a summary of the findings of a recent publication from the American Institute of Physics that received worldwide attention (over 150 outlets). We have added the reference to the paper too. The summary was removed from your team, but we cannot understand what the reason is. We would most appreciate it if you would advise us on this matter. Many thanks for your time.

Best regards,

Dr Talib Dbouk

Orginal text:

"In May 2020 Dbouk and Drikakis  published a study On Coughing and Airborne Droplet Transmission to Humans showing for the first time that respiratory droplets may travel up to unexpected considerable distances depending on the wind speed. Their discovery was based on advanced multiphase flow simulations that take into account the relative humidity, the turbulent dispersion forces, droplets phase-change, evaporation and breakup in addition to the droplets-droplets and droplets-air interactions. When the wind speed was approximately zero, the saliva droplets do not go beyond 2 meters, which is within the social distancing recommendations. However, at wind speeds varying from 4 to 15 km/h, the researchers found that saliva droplets can travel to distances up to 6 meters with decreasing concentrations and liquid droplets size in the wind direction. Their findings imply that the 2 meters social distance may not be sufficient."