User talk:TalisaMoss

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Peer review
Your article lead was missing information.

The article sections were appropriate and ordered chronologically, however, the section with the works could have been placed before the in-depth dissection of the works in their respected decades.

The sources all seem very credible with a wide variety of sources from libraries as well as websites and online articles.

There is obviously still a lot of writing that needs to be condensed from the writings added so far, but everything seems relevant to the artist and so far remains neutral.

Not sure if the ‘awards’ section is necessary if there aren’t any to put in there (I could be wrong, maybe you just haven’t added them yet) Luca Feher (talk) 06:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)