User talk:Talisings

October 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Noahidism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, I'm GenoV84. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Noahidism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Take your disgusting propaganda somewhere else, because no one's buying it anymore. GenoV84 (talk) 19:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Noahidism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 19:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi GenoV84 I gave an explanation the first time I did the edit. You reverted only because you're clearly anti-semitic, as was made obvious by the creepy link you sent. Please do not continue posting using anti-semitic language or attacking people otherwise I will be forced to report you and request to have your edit powers revoked. Wikipedia is a place for facts not racist opinions. Thank you.


 * Wikipedia doesn't allow to censor nor delete informations provided by academic, reliable references, written by academic scholars and published by reliable publishers, as in the case of Rachel Z. Feldman and her research article published in an academic, peer-reviewed journal specialized in the academic study of new religious movements, which you deleted because you consider it to be "anti-semitic", despite the fact that Feldman herself is Jewish.... GenoV84 (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi GenoV84 I just did a quick search and while she does use the word supremacist in her work she never uses the word racist. How about we compromise to get rid of the word racist. This language, if kept, only serves to create resentment towards Jews (and by the way, just because someone is Jewish doesn't mean they can't be anti-semitic towards members other factions of Judaism) and embolden anti-semites.


 * I have no time to waste with someone who deliberately vandalizes an encyclopedic article affirming that the academic sources cited in the text are "anti-semitic" and proceeds to accuse the author of the aforementioned academic sources to be an "anti-semite" despite the fact that the author is Jewish. The answer is No. GenoV84 (talk) 19:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I have no time to waste with actual racists! In your own words I say, "Take your disgusting propaganda somewhere else, because no one's buying it anymore"! @GenoV84