User talk:TalkM



Hello, TalkM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   — DaxServer (talk) 09:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Use Reliable sources.
Don't use Bollywood Bubble as a source. It's not reliable source. Use Reliable sources like Bollywood Hungama, The Times of India, The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, Firstpost, India Today, Mid Day, DNS, Mumbai Mirror, The Hindu, Zee news, Abp news, ANI News etc. Sush150 (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please don't use Bollywood Bubble source it's not appropriate source. Sush150 (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I see that you have been advised by twice before, regarding use of Bollywood Bubble as a reliable source. You have again cited content at Vicky Kaushal using this source, and this has been reverted. If you have questions or would like to discuss about this source, feel free to ask.  Jay (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

But Bollywood Bubble is a reliable source. It's a online new portal and they are into the business since 8-12 years.
 * Ok thanks. Since the above posts were in November, and there was no counter from you, I assumed it was agreed that the site was unreliable. Sush150 may want to bring up any points as to the unreliability. Jay (talk) 15:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Read WP:ICTFSOURCES  Sush150 (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Again I warn you don't use Bollywood Bubble source it's not appropriate source. Sush150 (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Please let me know why do you consider Bollywood Bubble as inappropriate source so that it will be easier for me in future. Bollywood Bubble is into the business for the last 12 years.

Please read our old discussion I already told that Bollywood Bubble was not appropriate source. So stop adding it and make a habit to add appropriate sources. Sush150 (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't get an appropriate reason for calling Bollywood Bubble as an unreliable source. You have mentioned to use TOI, Indian Express, HT's citation but didn't mention the reason for calling BB as unreliable source.
 * Did you go through the above mentioned WP:ICTFSOURCES page which mentions Bollywood Bubble as unreliable? Do you have an issue with the site being listed as unreliable at that page? Jay (talk) 10:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

In WP:ICTFSOURCES clearly mentioned Bollywood Bubble is not reliable source. Sush150 (talk) 13:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Please stop using Bollywood Bubble as a source, it's a non-reliable one, as already mentioned by the other editors. I guess you've still not gone through WP:ICTFSOURCES, kindly read it once. ManaliJain (talk) 10:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Erica Fernandes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please check WP:DADASAHEB Sid95Q (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Jay (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You have been adding links from bollywoodbubble to several articles, despite they getting reverted. You are continuing to do the same, despite the section above when you were asked not to. Jay (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Varun Dhawan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nayandeep Rakshit


The article Nayandeep Rakshit has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  10:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hi TalkM! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Kisi Ka Bhai Kisi Ki Jaan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. You are making almost all your edits as Minor, while they are not.  Jay  💬 12:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Jawan (film). Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)