User talk:Talkativeness

--talkativeness

Blocked as a sockpuppet
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:3Oh Hexelon&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/3Oh Hexelon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

bons mots Ok but explain why I am given a block indefinitely while User:3Oh Hexelon has been given a temporary block of 3 months. Surely I would deserve a 3 month block too considering the fact that User:3Oh Hexelon was the main vandaliser and my vandalism was minor compared to his? Jezebel's Ponyo

Thanks for not responding and proving that the permanent block I received was absolute shambles and was completely pathetic. You have nothing to say because you know anyone in their right mind would have given me a temporary one instead. Not a single one of you could explain why I received a permanent block rather than a temporary one even after only getting 1 chance rather than other people who receive many temporary blocks before they get a permanent one. Absolute pathetic clowns!, all three of you Jezebel's Ponyo  Yamla Callanecc

✅ with. --Yamla (talk) 10:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Initially, you claimed you were not violating WP:SOCK. You have now edited your unblock request to indicate that you were indeed editing on behalf of your friend, even though you knew they were blocked. That is indeed a violation of WP:MEAT and does indeed justify your block. --Yamla (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok yes but all that proves is that I’m not a sock puppet and a permanent ban is absolutely meaningless. This is the first time I’ve ever violated WP:MEAT. Why do other people get temporary bans while I’m here getting a permanent ban for the 1st ever time I violated the conditions. This clearly indicates that I’m not being given the same rights as every other user as whenever they violate the conditions they get a minimum week ban while here I am getting a permanent one. And then again I had no idea the edit was a violation as I wasn’t informed about initially thinking it was a good contribution Talkativeness (talk) 18:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I have read WP:MEAT and nowhere does it say that permanent bans are given to people who violate it. I don’t understand why a temporary ban wasn’t given instead. Again I demand to be unblocked as your reasoning for giving me a permanent ban is poor Talkativeness (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

And actually no I didnt know that he was blocked as stated in the initial reasoning " I actually had no idea that it was abusive", he randomly messaged me asking me to edit the page, I complied thinking that it was a useful contribution. I have apologized for it even though Im not the one in the wrong, how come I get a permanent ban, you've literally been doing this for 16 years as your account states, surely you would know that a temporary ban is more suited to someone who has only ever committed one mistake while being on wiki. Please give me another chance and let me make useful contributions again.

I dont know if you are choosing to ignore me Yamla, but im not going anywhere, I deserve the same rights as everyone else on here. I demand to be unblocked. You have been very unprofessional in giving me a proper reason on why I have been banned and have avoided to answer my case and avoided to provide a thorough investigation on this. I am seriously thinking of emailing wiki support and discussing this with them. You are supposed to be an administrator on this and you have acted unaccordingly. Anyone would know that the ban I was given was utterly pathetic and a temporary ban would make much more sense. If you are unable to see that then I would like someone else to review my this situation as you are unfit to do this and very biased in trying to get me off this app. Im extremely agitated at you compliance and co-operation with me on this topic.

I DEMAND TO BE UNBLOCKED(English) JE DEMANDE D'ÊTRE DÉBLOQUÉ(French) Exijo ser desbloqueado(Spanish) 我要求畅通无阻(Chinese) أطالب بأن أكون غير محظور(Arabic) ਮੈਂ ਅਨਬਲੌਕਡ ਹੋਣ ਦੀ ਮੰਗ ਕਰਦਾ ਹਾਂ(Punjabi) ΖΗΤΩ ΝΑ ΑΠΟΚΛΕΙΣΤΩ(Greek) Ich fordere, entsperrt zu werden(German) ТРЕБУЮ РАЗБЛОКИРОВАТЬ(Russian)
 * You are confused. I didn't block you. Your block log is visible here. If you wish, I'm happy to decline your open unblock request but I strongly suggest you'd be better suited having an independent administrator review your request instead. You have more of a chance of your unblock request being granted if you explain exactly the relationship between the two accounts, including why you both edited from the same IP address. --Yamla (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.