User talk:Talkinghorse

Nomination of Hollie Greig for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Hollie Greig, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hollie Greig until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi there; actually, the article was deleted per WP:CSD, as it makes criminal allegations about living individuals who have not been charged with such crimes. This is a violation of our policy on biographies of living people and articles containing such claims will always be immediately deleted.  On a broader note, whilst this is a tragic story I would suggest that it is unlikely to meet our policies on notability and even if it does, would need to be re-written so as to not name any other party.  Given the close relationship of one of those mentioned in the story to Hollie, this may prove impossible. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

The Da Vinci Code
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to The Da Vinci Code, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the material was removed because it was not relevant to the Da Vinci Code, and appears to convey a personal point of view, which violates Wikipedia's Neutrality policy. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 16:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Llanrhydd Rural
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Llanrhydd Rural, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://medieval-wales.com/site_01c_llanrhydd.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Llanrhydd Rural


A tag has been placed on Llanrhydd Rural requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://medieval-wales.com/site_01c_llanrhydd.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G S Palmer (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Homeopathy
You need to discuss proposed changes at the Talk page. Guy (Help!) 23:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Doug 2012.jpg


The file File:Doug 2012.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)