User talk:Tamar Chkhartishvili

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:EUt%2B Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SafariScribe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EUt%2B reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:EUt%2B Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OnlyNano&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EUt%2B reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNanotalk 01:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I should also mention you have not fixed any of the sourcing errors, so that is still going to apply. I would suggest you add more sources before you resubmit. OnlyNanotalk 01:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi!
 * I have a question, I tried to fix everything, also sources, they are official EU sources and University website, I do not understand how can I correct it. can you help? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure! I declined your submission because it's not written in the correct tone that you would see in an encyclopedia. In your case, it is written in a promotional way. There is word choice such as "cutting-edge" and "innovative." While they might have an innovative program, this comes off as promotional, and unencyclopedic (as your goal is, in terms of tone, to write in a formal tone). You can check out this page on encyclopedic tone to get more information about what we're looking for in terms of tone.
 * Additionally, in terms of sources, we actually want to steer around primary sources (such as a universities page, if they are involved in the program). Instead, a great source would be a newspaper which wrote an article about EUt+. They are independent of the topic. You can find a great sourcing guide here. A great example of a source you picked very well was the Le Monde article.
 * A small suggestion would be renaming the "Contact" section to "External links," as that can appear promotional. Though there is no issue with simply providing a link to their website.
 * If you need more help, or have completed those changes, I'd be happy to re-review the article, if you'd like! OnlyNanotalk 14:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey, I modified my article and trying to publish the changes but it says "No stashed content found for 1233814434/10cc3dcf-3f23-11ef-8b3d-01e0acf07608"- what should I do? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hmm, that seems like a technical issue that's above my knowledge. I'd suggest creating a thread at the Teahouse, that way someone can take a look at what's going on. OnlyNanotalk 22:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey! Thanks for a tip, I published the new version, can you have a look? I think on this time it should be good Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Of course :) I'm making some minor edits, but there seems to be a lot of opinion-based content and still a bit of promotional wording, but I'll take a look and edit what I can. OnlyNanotalk 00:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much, this is my first ever experience to publish something in Wikipedia and it is really important for me, I really tried to change every sentence and make it neutral tone as much as I could. Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem, you're still new to all of this! Take a look at some of the comments I left (they are invisible, but you can see them in the editor), and let me know when you make some of those changes! I didn't want to rework your entire article, so I left some things for you to decide :) OnlyNanotalk 15:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)