User talk:Tameika05

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Abortion in Panama has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://atheism.about.com/od/abortioncontraception/p/Religions.htm. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Abortion in Panama
Regarding the cleanup tag about no footnotes, please see WP:CITE for instructions on adding references and footnotes. Simply adding the text " [1] " after some text is not the correct method for adding footnotes. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: if you can show me which source applies to which text, I can do the first one for you as an example. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I am working on this page for class as a group project so i will not be the only person edditing and adding citations. I have placed a citation in the work which i hope suffices. Again my group memebers will be doing some citations editing as well. I hope the page is not reversed again, as our work has been undone before. Tameika05 (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Tameika05
 * I added some formatting to the ref which was added, to act as a guideline for future additions - I hope that helps.
 * The cleanup tag should be left-on for now, as it requests additional in-line citations. Don't worry about having a cleanup tag, many articles have those - they simply point to areas where additional efforts are needed to bring the article up to Wikipedia standards.
 * Re: the revert, it appears to have been done by an automated bot due to a specific link from a source which is generally considered to not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for appropriate sourcing or linking. Unfortunately, the bot roles back to the last edit by an editor other than the one who added the link, so multiple edits were reverted.  There are reasons for that type of revert, but would take to long to explain here.  Sorry about the inconvenience that revert caused. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)