User talk:Tametiger

Image tagging for Image:Palanivelrajan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Palanivelrajan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Palanivelrajan.jpg
Can you tell us where the owner of Image:Palanivelrajan.jpg has released it into the public domain? -- Sundar \talk \contribs 06:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Another user Harlowraman had loaded a similar picture Please refer to the talk Re:help needed regarding images in Harlowraman Talk page [] Please refer to the link in the conversation .I fully agree with GaneshK. This picture is from the Tamil Nadu governement website []

Re: Hereditary Education Policy
Hey Tametiger,

Thank you for the kind words about my contributions to Wikipedia. I really appreciate the positive feedback. =)

In regards to the Hereditary Education Policy article, I am hindered by the fact that I know next to nothing about the history of India. I ran across the article last night while on RC Patrol and reverted an edit by an anonymous user that took out lots of information from the article. Further communication with this anon revealed him to be very reasonable, and I posted on his talk page and tried to encourage him to make productive edits to the article. I then tagged it with the cleanup tag, because the article has several problems.

First off, while I admit to knowing nothing about the issue the article is written on, it does seem to have some POV problems; the article makes controversial interpretations of events and doesn't support them with a whole lot of historical evidence. On an issue as controversial as this, the article should be in pristine shape and cite all relevant facts and opinions, so that the article can serve as a good, solid resource for people on both sides of the issue.

However, that is not the only reason I added a cleanup tag. Other than that, the article also simply needs a basic "cleanup" to improve things like grammar, punctuation, and spacing. The article's information could probably be presented in a more organized manner, too.

Because I know nothing about this subject, I made a post on the Notice board for India-related topics, in the hopes that an experienced editor of India-related articles would come forward and take care of the necessary cleanup.

Under the circumstances, this is about all I can do. I did revert the aforementioned anon's removal of information from the article, but it still could use a major overhaul. Hopefully my post on the India-related topics noticeboard will bring some other editors onboard and help to improve the article to a quality that we can all be happy with.

Let me know if you have any additional concerns. – Lantoka  (talk) 07:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Josephpr.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Josephpr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:CMKaruna.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CMKaruna.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ganeshk ( talk ) 16:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Josephp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Josephp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aksi_great (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)