User talk:Tamiko O'Brien

Nonsense of Fine Art Higher Education
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fine Art Higher Education, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fine Art Higher Education provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fine Art Higher Education, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:COI
Hi Tamiko, you might want to read WP:COI, regarding Wikipedia's guidelines for conflict of interest, as well as the more general overview provided by: If you have further questions, you can contact an administrator WP:ADMIN, or seek feedback here WP:RFC/ART. Cheers, JNW (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary

Nomination of PARADOX (research network) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PARADOX (research network) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PARADOX (research network) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Darkwind (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)