User talk:Tamilfilm


 * You don't appear t be blocked directly. What message are you getting when you try to edit? Peridon (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Aah! I believe I've got it. You are evidently the editor who used the account Kreacreations, which is blocked. You should be careful how you edit, and read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest. Your editing so far has been somewhat promotional, but I don't think enough so to make it necessary at present to block this account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey "JamesBWatson" (talk) Exactly. I got an email from WikiMedia Commons  asking me to create a user id. I thought that is different and I used kreacreations. Where did I promote Krea? I had to give references and I thought the best reference for the number of plays i have directed would be from past productions in my website. And one more thing the moment I created kreacreations tmailfilm id was not displayed. I got so confused. I am not a technical person and I am just a creative person in the arts and entertainment field. I am disturbed that someone is kind of accusing me that I am using this for promotional activity while that is not the truth. I had to create a page for myself as I am acting in Films now. And as I had suggested in my previous message in the request, Wiki should think of making this process user friendly and not send intimidating messages like your article will be deleted etc. Anyways I am so confused and puzzled - why did I even get a mail from Wikimedia asking me to create an id? One more thing - How do I upload a photo JamesBWatson? Thanks in advance :-)

Here is what I get when I click on the Edit button

You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia due to an autoblock affecting your IP address. This is because someone using this internet address or shared proxy server was blocked. The ability of all users on this IP address to edit pages has been automatically suspended to prevent abuse by the blocked party. Innocent users are sometimes caught in an autoblock. It may be the case that you have done nothing wrong. A user of this IP address was blocked by Alexf for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Kreacreations". The reason given for Kreacreations's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.


 * I can't find any autoblock affecting this account. Probably the autoblock has expired, but if you find it is still in effect, then make another unblock request, but this time give the autoblock number. The number should be included in the notice you see telling you about the autoblock, probably preceded by #. There should be instructions there on how to request the lifting of an autoblock, using the template.
 * I think that such language as "Krea's productions have been well received by the critics as well as the audience in USA and India", "well received by educationists and students from all over Tamil Nadu" and "with the intention of producing quality plays" could reasonably be regarded as mildly promotional.
 * As far as I know, the only possible reason why you could have received the email you refer to is that you must have your account preferences set to receive an email notification of talk page posts.
 * I totally agree that the way issues such as being blocked for promotional usernames and promotional editing could be far more user friendly. Personally, I never use the particular block notice which was sent to the Kreacreations account, because I think it is intimidating and unhelpful.
 * You say "I had to create a page for myself as I am acting in Films now". However, I'm afraid you have misunderstood the nature of Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not exist for people to tell the world about themselves, and editors are strongly discouraged from creating articles about themselves. As I said above, you should look at the guideline on conflict of interest.
 * Wikipedia does not aim to have articles about anyone and anything: to be the topic of an article, a subject has to satisfy certain notability guidelines. In my opinion, Wikipedia has far too many policies and guidelines, and many of them are unnecessarily long, making it confusing and difficult for new editors to know what is acceptable and what isn't. However, the guidelines most relevant in your case are the general notability guideline and the guideline on notability of people.
 * I have looked at the sources linked in the article, and I have also searched for information about you. Nothing I have seen anywhere suggests to me that you come anywhere near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I checked a fair number of web pages mentioning you, and none of them had the sort of coverage needed, but even before looking at any of them, I doubted that I would find any evidence of notability by Wikipedia's standards: it is not an encouraging sign when the first couple of pages of Google hits are dominated with things such as IMdB, your company's own web site, Facebook, Linkedin, Wikipedia, a Google profile, names.whitepages.com, a local Bay area newa web site, and YouTube.
 * You are, of course, very welcome to contribute to Wikipedia on other subjects, where you have no conflict of interest, but if your only interest in editing is to use Wikipedia to publicise yourself and your work, then Wikipedia is not the right place for you. If and when you become really notable according to Wikipedia's standards, probably some uninvolved outsider will create a Wikipedia article about you.
 * Finally, you ask about how to upload a photograph. The process is explained at Uploading images. I'm afraid when I first started editing Wikipedia, I found it very confusing. To actually do the upload, you can use Special:Upload or File Upload Wizard. The "upload wizard" is intended to make the process easier for new editors; whether it does so, I can't say. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dheepa Ramanujam


The article Dheepa Ramanujam has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dheepa Ramanujam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dheepa Ramanujam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dheepa Ramanujam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)