User talk:Tammycs

Welcome!
Hello, Tammycs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Im Learning Tammycs (talk) 12:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets


The article Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No secondary sources, fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sigma Gamma Rho Secrets


A tag has been placed on Sigma Gamma Rho Secrets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &#8213; Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 10:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Zeta Phi Beta Secrets, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I've put Sigma Gamma Rho Secrets, Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets and Zeta Phi Beta Secrets up for discussion as well, at Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets, since they all seem to be basically the same article. --McGeddon (talk) 11:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Alpha Secrets. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Do not blank comments or deletion nominations you disagree with. McGeddon (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Alpha Kappa Alpha. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Omega Psi Phi. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)