User talk:Tamparitus

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tamparitus! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Babegriev (talk) 07:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Tamparitus (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

January 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Atlanta. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (in the Climate section) &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 19:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Atlanta, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Your edits in no way met the criteria under which they could be flagged "minor". &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 19:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

All I did was re-use the data that was incorrectly worded. Temperatures don't "occasionally" reach 100F in Atlanta, in fact its quite rare. Also, Atlanta usually, not rarely, has a few days during the winter season that do not reach the freezing mark. Perhaps you should go back through the weather records over the past century and count how many days reached 100F versus how many days that remained below freezing. Then perhaps you will understand. Also, the 10 inch snowfall is the record for the airport, which should be specified isn't even in the city limits of Atlanta. During the 93 Super-storm, areas that were actually inside the city limits of Atlanta received close to a foot of snow. There was no reason for me to cite the same sources again. Its not my mistake people cannont comprehend the data already at hand, or word it properly.