User talk:Tamravidhir/Archive 4

Philately Wikiproject
Welcome to the Philately WikiProject. Hopefully you have a good time, start many new articles and can contribute lots to the existing ones as we need that. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:Help
Hi Jagadhatri, Thank you for asking me a question but am so sorry I couldn't respond you in time as i was not well those days and couldn't access Wiki. Also, I am sorry to say that I dont know much about clickable image maps on Wiki as I never used it. If you have already found out please share the knowledge with me too. Regards. --Msrag (talk) 05:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply
Now both the article's name is italicized — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajyot123 (talk • contribs) 12:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://murshidabad.net/history/history-topic-ali-jah.htm. As a copyright violation, Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ymblanter (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I marked the article for speedy deletion, since its text appears to be slight rewording of what is found in the original source. Despite this slight rewording, it is still a copyright violation. If you are the author of the text, or you have a permission to distribute it, please add hangon on the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
Since it is important to have an article on him, instead of deleting it as reviewing administrator, I removed everything but a paragraph or two of rewritten summary and the genealogical tables.

It is absolutely unacceptable to write Wikipedia articles in this fashion! if you have written any others like this, please fix them at once. Rewrite them completely in your own words, using the references only a source of information.

When you rewrite an article like this, consider what part of  the material in the source is suitable suitable: it contained   great detail about the coronation   and funeral ceremonies, but nothing actually about the events of his reign. It would be very highly advisable to use additional sources--an article on an historical personage should be based on a variety of modern histories.

It is possible from its style and coverage  that the source you used was for the most part only reprinting older materials, but it gave no references. If you think this was the case, you must find the original sources.=, and cite them. If they were published before 1923, which seems quite likely, you may quote them--but you absolutely must use quotation marks and give exact references for every individual piece of material quoted.

I am going to check back here tomorrow for your response, and to see what other articles you have written. I will expect to find that any additional copyvio aterial has been removed or rewritten,--or at least that you have started doing this.

And, for the record, I need to warn you that if you ever insert copyvio material again, i shall block you from contributing to prevent further violation.  DGG ( talk ) 16:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I am extremely sorry for violating the rules and also for the late reply. I have removed all the information (also on other articles) which were copyvio, as I was unable to rewrite them in my own words. Thank you for your notification.-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 10:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Jodhaa Akbar.
Actually, there are two reasons why I don't think that the double surname for Aishwarya Rai on the Jodhaa Akbar page is appropriate. One is that her page on wikipedia is named Aishwarya Rai, not Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. Second, it's the most common name she's known with, so much so that it has almost become her professional name, in my opinion. Ngebendi (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * But the actual film credits her as Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * This would undercut my second reason, I guess. But the fact still remains that her wikipedia page is called "Aishwarya Rai", not "A. R. Bachchan". Her page logs show numerous attempts to rename it either to "Aishwarya Bachchan" or "Aishwarya Rai Bachchan" - regularly reverted. It seems therefore that her maiden name is here to stay. I would therefore keep it as such also in any other suitable page, with a "credited as Aiswarya Rai Bachchan" as needed. Ngebendi (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The common name criteria you mention is meant for giving name to the article. Not for how the subject is mentioned in other articles. Draupadi can very well be called as "Paanchali" or "Sairandhri" in any article and be hyperlinked properly. She doesn't need to always be called as Draupadi throughout Wikipedia. The very first line of Rai's article states that she is called "Aishwarya Rai Bachchan". (See, I used only Rai instead of the full name, which is completely acceptable even in the articles.) If she has preferred to call herself so in the film, we should have the same name. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with Animesh as she shot the film after her marriage and then her actual name was A.R. Bachchhan irrespective of the Wiki article.-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 08:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

As you wish - she's mentioned multiple times in the article. Ngebendi (talk) 08:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:Saas Bina Sasural Edits
Please check again whether the article exists or not before you blindly undo it. The actress DOES have an article, her name is being spelled either way in the media. I am reverting your edit again if you don't mind. Saamikannu (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Your edits in Saas Bina Sasural have been reverted as the article does not exist and the spelling is wrong. Thank you, -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 15:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making me know that but you should not have that tone, you may have made me understand with a softer tone, if you do that again it may be taken as personal attack and you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 16:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey, thanks for helping me with the file File:Vintage Postcard of Gateway of India.jpg. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It was my pleasure to help my fellow Wikipedian. -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 06:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * the images has hell no. of images. Trying to remove as many images as they can all be found in the Commons at a single click. Reply here, I'm watching your talkpage! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I think tampering with the images is not enough. The images are fine?! Are they...?-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 07:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * As of now, I'm disturbed with the images. I'm finding it very difficult to read contents because of vast number of images. Otherwise, looks a GA in a future :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I too think that it has the potential to become a GA and later a FA. Well I too am working on the images. -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 07:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, don't feel bad I'm removing some images. Image dos and don'ts says that, Don't overload articles with images.. Hence, removing many and having only which adds relevancy to the article, though all images deserve it!-- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No it's fine..well can you nominate this article for GA. -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 07:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Those are probably new features in the watchlist. If you had edited the page, and my edit followed your edits, it states "updated since my last visit", which is automated. I wish I'm right :P, because that's what I understood :D

I won't nominate for GA now, instead you can try Did you know... and then few weeks later GAN. Will be great if many editors pitch in, so lets give a time. But, I don't mind in nominating for GAN too, give me some time for that. Will need to go through each and every line of the article, referenecs too :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, how can I nominate it for DYK? -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 08:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Its here: Template talk:Did you know. However, I'm not finding any interesting hook abut Tourism in West Bengal, which will also make it difficult for GAN. The article lead sections doesn't speaks anything about tourism. I'm trying to find few. You too, give a try :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:11, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * currently I am stubbing several articles to rv copy vio so I may hardly get any time to look upon it. -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 08:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'll try my best :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I would like to inform you that the article (Tourism in West Bengal) largely uses information from other Wiki articles like West Bengal, Culture of West Bengal and Culture of Darjeeling. -- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 08:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I understood when I had a first look :P -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, are you really working on it as you have not edited it since a long time?!-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 08:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Lunch time dude :P -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * OOPS!! It's lunch time naa..? I forgot...see you soon..-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 08:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you know that how a tourism related article must be written?-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 09:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Best example: Tourism in India. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * What are the missing points of Tourism in West Bengal?...as I may add as you are not doing so...-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 09:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Tourism economy of West Bengal. Tired of searching those, great if you find those. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Please watch these...
Dude, its impossible for me to watch all these articles. I will be watching this every fortnight, will you mind for that? I have my even my final years starting within few days. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * all the best for your exams dude! Have a great break :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops! :P My exams will be in November, probably, but will be busy with assignments and blah blah blah :-o Won't be very much available then for almost a year. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Speakback
-- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No one check your revisions now! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You know why as I was against many vandals..and they may be seeking for revenge..so I was scared...-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 11:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * But now I want myself to be renamed with a very very uncommon name...can you suggest one..-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 11:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Its your wish, but keep an interesting one. More details here: WP:USERNAME. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * How about Kolgal? Is it uncommon?-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 11:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Dekha Ek Khwaab
The page was protected by before you left the message on my talk page. And yes, that's me in the WMF video, well spotted. Deryck C. 13:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikimania 2010. Deryck C. 13:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Once renaming is done, you should be able to log in using your new username and old password. Deryck C. 13:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Depends on whether you're just creating a new account, or actually requesting a proper rename. Deryck C. 13:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't know, depends on how they decide to do it. Deryck C. 13:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Request for more info
Hello Jagadhatri, I understand you will be away for the next few weeks but have a quick question should you happen to pop in. You left a message here accusing the editor of personal attacks against you. However I can not see any such attacks in their recent edit history and indeed they have not edited since my final warning to them. Could you provide a link to the personal attack you mention in the dif above? Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 14:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well hang on..he wrote "Uday Veer is the male protagonist. What proof do you have that he is not. Stop deleting one warning."-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 14:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Link: here-- Jagad hatri (২০১২) 14:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not a personal attack at all, it mentions nothing of you specifically, only of your edits. Would you mind removing your last message to this user as it is not correct and is really just serving to inflame the situation? They have not edited since they received a final warning (from me) and I don't want to antagonize them unnecessarily. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 14:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Seconded Ponyo. -- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 16:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 9 June 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuch Toh Log Kahenge.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Kuch Toh Log Kahenge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Panipuri


Titodutta has invited you a for a plate of spicy Panipuri! Panipuri promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can give someone else a plate of Panipuri to spread Wikilove too!

To share a plate of Panipuri, simply add {{subst:Panipuri}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Devgarh Royal Family 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Devgarh Royal Family 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)