User talk:Tanada

Notability of Frank Gasperik
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Frank Gasperik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Frank Gasperik seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Frank Gasperik, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Frank Gasperik itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The article was speedied by a sockpuppet who was soon after banned for disruptive activity. That doesn't mean that the tagging was wrong, but the non-notability claim has been disputed and the article restored. I feel that sufficient notability given his influence on Niven and Pournelle has been established. — PhilHibbs | talk 11:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

April 2008
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  --EEMIV (talk) 03:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Rice wine?
You only mention rice wine but there also exists distillate spirits of rice!

145.129.136.48 (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M114 155 mm howitzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/M114_155_mm_howitzer check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/M114_155_mm_howitzer?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you, the incorrect link has been fixed 5/27/2020 10:20 EDT

Wikipedia and copyright

 * Control copyright icon.svg Hello TestUser, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Test have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 19:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Revised text in my own words to comply with copyright discrepancy

April 2022
Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Calcium, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 10:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

You forgot to update inline citations for 1632 series article
Hello Tanada!

Just letting know that when you update figures in the article 1632 series in, and later you forgot to replace the existing December 2019 Locus Magazine article citation with a newer citation that would support the "newer" 2019 figures since a magazine article written in 2016 cannot support figures of a latter date per WP:CRYSTALBALL. If you look at the recent editing history, other editors are removing material that are not supported by 3rd party citations that pass both WP:V and WP:INDEPENDENT, so your newer numbers maybe reverted if you do not include newer inline citations.

BTW, didn't Eric Flint gave a more recent magazine interview (in 2021 or 2022) in which he gave more recent figures? I vaguely remember reading something that was published online during the past year, but unable to recall where I had seen it. -- 108.71.214.235 (talk) 04:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)