User talk:Tanbircdq/Archive 2011

The 100
Hi, I reverted your addition to The 100. Per copyright reason you can't publish the whole list. Garion96 (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Michael Hart
Did you really want to add this book by a racist to the article? Dougweller (talk) 20:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Muhammad. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Please start using edit summaries, your edits may be reverted simply because you haven't explained them and the reasons aren't obvious. Dougweller (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

List of British Bangladeshis
See Talk:List of British Bangladeshis for some notes on the article. Also, it would be good if you could use edit summaries, especially when making reverts. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

your edits at Zakir Naik
Zakir Naik

I reverted all your edits there, they were uncited, please don't do that again your editing rights are a privilege and can be restricted. Off2riorob (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kamal Uddin (singer)


The article Kamal Uddin (singer) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I haven't been able to find significant coverage of this Imam/performer in reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guideline or any other information that would satisfy the notability guidelines for musicians.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Them From  Space  23:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kamal Uddin (singer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamal Uddin (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kamal Uddin (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Peculiar contributions - Islam and link spam
Sir - I note your peculiar additions to the article about Aladin. You have added a link spam namely http://eenasul-fateh.co.tv which clearly has no relation to the subject himself. You are possibly the proprietor of this website. You have also added a spurious and unsustainable aside as to his religion. You also have an history of unsustainable additions to Wikipedia relating to 'Islamic' topics. You must desist. Waltonuponthames (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 2Point9 Records, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Laila_-_Shahin_Badar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Laila_-_Shahin_Badar.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 16:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kamal Uddin (singer)


A tag has been placed on Kamal Uddin (singer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:26, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mujaddid, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  --Peace world  07:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
You've added beautiful pics on Jesus in Islam, but you've made too much edits at once. Please work on one section at a time, as you've made many mistakes. It just takes a longer time to fix this way. Thanks     ~ AdvertAdam   talk  09:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Photo added to Burial places of founders of world religions
You added a photo and captioned it as Muhammad's tomb. However the Wikimedia Commons description attached to the photo says "Tombstone of Umar, the third caliph". Could you explain. DeCausa (talk) 15:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the Infobox
I am very happy you added the saint infobox to some of the Sahaba. Could you help add it to more of them?--Imadjafar (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent articles
Hi, please explain why we need articles on non-notable ancestors of Muhammad? Jarkeld (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm not convinced of their notability. You may want to add more sources to those articles to demonstrate notability, rather than continue to create more poorly sourced stubs. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zuhrah ibn Kilab


The article Zuhrah ibn Kilab has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable historical figure.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:32, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Zuhrah ibn Kilab for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zuhrah ibn Kilab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zuhrah ibn Kilab until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Islamic views on Elijah


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Islamic views on Elijah. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Elijah. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Elijah - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 00:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Islamic views on Ishmael


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Islamic views on Ishmael. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Ishmael. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ishmael - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Global_Peace_and_Unity_Event_2005_DVD.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Global_Peace_and_Unity_Event_2005_DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Your suggestion/view requested on Titles
Regarding title of prominent person of  Islam even in the sub pages title are not as per name prominent in Islam. Take the case of Isa nabi, article is named as ‘Islamic view of Jesus’ and not as ‘Isa’ with argument that Isa is not a ‘most common name’ in English, whereas policy on  title does n’t restrict. I have discussion on this subject on 'talk' page of ‘Islamic view of Jesus’( may like to see history of that page) but I have to withdraw as there was not enough support for my argument. Here is some of my arguments and questionnare which I prepared to get the support. If you feel some weightage in my reasoning please comment such that due weightage can be given for islamic personality in Wiki English which is international platform. My argument is :

For special article (Jesus in Islam) granted, the title should be the name which is known to most "readers who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic( that the article is indeed about that topic)". Here the topic is of Islam and obviously most readers are muslims who refer him by Isa as of his first name.These readres are in bulk in billion,who can read english and you can't deny them their rights.

Here where is the question of ‘most common name’ ? “isa” is also a ‘common name’ in English if not ‘most common’ and that is sufficient to qualify for tittle as per ‘principle’ criteria of ‘Recognizability’ of Wiki policy, where deliberately ‘most’ word is not used.

I don’t know where is the hitch and why everyone is insisting on ‘most common name’ when most common name is already used in the main article on ‘Jesus’ and this is additional article for which link already exist from main article.

Hence I have prepared a questinare ,only to be answered in yes or no.Hope every contributor to the discussion will have this much time to read and answer( I have narrated concerned policy in brief first for the ready reference). Answer of this will decide what is real consensus?

Wiki Policy:

“Wikipedia:Article titles

This page in a nutshell: Article titles should be recognizable to readers, unambiguous, and consistent with usage in reliable English-language sources. ‘’’The principal criteria’’’ used by editors when deciding on a title for an article include:

“Recognizability –

an ideal title will confirm, to readers who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic, that the article is indeed about that topic. One important aspect of this is the use of common English names as used in reliable sources on the subject”.

+ 'Naturalness'...+Precision...+Conciseness...+ Consistency.. Most articles will have a simple and obvious title that is better than any other in terms of most or all of these ideal criteria. If so, use it, as a straightforward choice.

Further Wiki guide line to above points

Common names: 1.‘Articles are normally titled using the name which is most commonly used to refer to the subject of the article in English-language reliable sources. This includes usage in the sources used as references for the article.’

2. ‘When there is no single obvious common name for the topic, as used by a significant majority of reliable English language sources, editors should reach a consensus as to which title is best by considering the other criteria identified above’.”

Now point by point analysis is done .I request all the contributors to answer each question in yes or No only.

Questionare:

Q.1- Is the policy guideline taken above from Wiki policy is ok to decide on title ? Q.2-Should be the ‘main criteria’ listed above to be main guiding factor? Q.3.Is Recognizability, + 'Naturalness'...+Precision...+Conciseness...+ Consistency.. are main criteria? Q.4- Recognizabilty is listed first in main criteria have lot importance ? Q.5 ‘An ideal title will confirm, to readers who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic, that the article is indeed about that topic. One important aspect of this is the use of common English names as used in reliable sources on the subject’ describe ‘ recognizibility’.Yes or No? Q.6 Hence title should; ‘confirm, to readers who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic, that the article is indeed about that topic’.Yes or No? Q.7 One aspect of recognizibilty(Q.5) is ‘use of common english name’. It is one of ‘important aspect’, but ‘principal criteria’ is fulfiling ‘recognizibility’.Yes or No? Q.8.Title to be selected on ‘principal criteria’ of ‘recognizibility’ and ‘When there is no single obvious common name for the topic, as used by a significant majority of reliable English language sources, editors should reach a consensus as to which title is best by considering the other criteria identified above’.Yes or No? Q.9.Hence the ‘other criteria identified above’ namely 'Naturalness'...+Precision...+Conciseness...+ Consistency..’ are the ‘main criteria’ which have lower order preference than ‘‘recognizibility’ ,but will guide further in judging common name.Yes or No? Q.10 In matter above, policy has asked for at least a ‘single obvious common name in english’.Yes or No? Q.11.There is policy guideline available for ‘common name’ which guide further in case of common name vs.Title, which says that ‘Articles are normally titled using the name which is most commonly used to refer to the subject of the article in English-language reliable sources. This includes usage in the sources used as references for the article.’ .Yes or No? Q.12 ‘Articles are normally titled using the name which is most commonly used to refer the subject.’As per policy above. Hence’ most common name’ is not compulsory .Yes or No? Q.13 ‘Recognizibility’ is ‘main criteria’ deciding title and not ‘the name most commonly used’.Yes or No? Q.13 (a). Hence an ideal title will confirm, to readers who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic, that the article is indeed about that topic. Common name in English would be acceptable. If in dispute most common name and then other criteria to be referred.Yes or No? Now on the specific case of article “Jesus in Islam’; Q.14 Type of article= Biography of Religious person related of specific religion Islam.,Yes or No? Q.15; Detail of person: One of prophet of Islam, known by the name Amongst Islam ;First name :Isa(known to all,even to less educated English reader)), Second name :Jesus etc. ( only known to well educated ) Amongst Christianity and others ; Jesus,Yeshu etc.etc.( some of them also know him as Isa) Yes or No? Q.16;Most person ‘who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic, that the article is indeed about that topic’ are follower of (directly concerned with) topic, hence follower (directly concerned with) of religion of the topic. Yes or No? Q.17;Concerned Religion of the topic is Islam,Yes or No? Q.18 Hence Most familiar person ( ‘who are familiar with (though not necessarily expert in) the topic, that the article is indeed about that topic’) are follower (directly concerned with topic) of Islam. Q.19 Population of these most familiar person are 1.8 billion. Even lowest literacy of 53 %, 1.0 billion most familiar English readers. Yes or not? Q.20 One billion familiar readers are sufficient qty to have right to have the separate article on the subject of their interest.in Wiki.. Wiki has already provided the article on the subject.? Q 21. Hence as per wiki policy title of this article should confirm to these most familiar readers(1 billion) who are follower (directly concerned with topic) of Islam? Q.22 As subject of article is most familiar to these most familiar reader by name ‘isa’. Tittle confirm to these readers are ‘Isa’. There is no ambiquity for this name amongst these most familiar readers’? Q.23 ‘Isa’ name is also one of ‘common name in English reliable sources’.

If all the answer to above are favourable than as per wiki policy nobody can deny to accept 'Isa' as title for article 'islamic view of Jeus"

Suggestions and answer to above are welcome please.--Md iet (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Global_Peace_&_Unity_Event_logo.jpg
I have tagged File:Global_Peace_&_Unity_Event_logo.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imad Rami


A tag has been placed on Imad Rami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 11:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BritBangla


The article BritBangla has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ORG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BritBangla


A tag has been placed on BritBangla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Night of the Big Wind talk  13:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BritBangla logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:BritBangla logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)