User talk:Tandelt

Welcome!
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Dawnseeker2000  21:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

National Ledger
Please note that the National Ledger is not considered a reliable source and is thus inappropriate for sourcing or as an external link here. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Sandra Bullock. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. As I noted before, National Ledger is NOT considered a reliable source. Please stop spamming this website to multiple articles. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

OK buddy, I stopped adding external links after you complained the first time, now you're freaking out about links I added prior to your warning. If you ask me People Magazine isn't any more reliable (or less self-published) a resource but it's sure spammed onto EVERY page. Tandelt (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:COI. If you are connected with National Ledger, it would be seen as spamming to mention it in Wikipedia articles without a good reason. National Ledger is not a WP:RS and does not add significant value as a source in Wikipedia articles.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 20:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, I am warning you about additions you made AFTER I brought it up on May 25. You have continued to add it you posted here that you have stopped: here, here and here. Thus the following warning:

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry guy, thought you were upset about additions to "EXTERNAL LINKS" section, I won't post any more citations either. You should check into all the unsourced material in biographies of living persons, much of it is against Wikipedia's policy regarding such articles. Tandelt (talk) 23:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Anything that isn't suitable for an external link is probably not suitable as a source and vice versa. There's an axiom here called WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Basically it says that even though other stuff exists that seems to be against the policies or guidelines, it isn't a valid reason to add that same stuff somewhere else. It will be gotten to eventually. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)