User talk:Tangane

Ubiplanet
to be updated

Ubiplanet
A tag has been placed on Ubiplanet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Ubiplanet. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bonadea 15:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

The difference between this page and Twango is that Twango cites sources establishing its notability. NawlinWiki 16:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

And so will we ! We have an article on Techcrunch FR to date. But for Twango, why notability should be an argument ? Our article is factual. Nothing more. What's about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallop for example ???
 * That hangon tag was marking this talk page for deletion... since I don't think that was the intent I removed the tag.--Isotope23 18:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes Sorry for that, it was a mistake. In fact this is a service alreday running and I have troubles to understand why an article writtent by a journalist somewhere would then open the wikipedia door. As you have seen, it was just a factual description of Ubiplanet. Nothing more. Twango is still a small site, and I think that making differences that way is somehow unfair. I am puzzled... My 2 cents.