User talk:Tanha Mahmud/sandbox

Additional references you might consider
Here are a couple of additional references that may be helpful:


 * Barron (1977)
 * Domsch et al. (1993)


 * Citation

Medmyco (talk) 22:53, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Assignment 3, Feedback: Hi there, hope you don't mind that I reviewed your draft. I liked that you added a section of Related Fungi, I haven't seen that yet in other drafts. Although I found your article to be interesting and written well, I found one statement to be a bit informal like when you wrote "to the human eye", I don't normally see phrasing like that on wiki pages, but I could definitely be wrong. Also, I would love to see a few more topics, which I know could be hard if there is a lack of research done on your fungi, as there seems to be with mine, but if possible, definitely add some! Great job.April pat (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

peer feedback
Hey Fariha, you work up till now looks great, but I thought you could include a few more sections to elaborate on your fungi. Like yours is a soil fungi like mine, so it may have something to do with plant contamination, which is of interest to the field of agriculture, so you could look into that. It's just a suggestion, I might be wrong about it, but just give it a search :) Ria99 (talk) 00:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I like what you have so far, but I noticed you mentioned nail infections in humans. It would be good if you could put up a section on how they occur, what kind of symptoms they cause, and so on. In the "Ecology" section, just noticed some minor issues with a spelling error where "inclusing" should be "including" in the first sentence and the second sentence doesn't make grammatical sense. Keep up the good work! Rptseng (talk) 03:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, your article looks very organized and I just have a few suggestions about it:

1. In intro section: "Although some isolated cases of human infections have been seen throughout the years, they have all been nail infections only" - I'm a little confusing about the statement. Do you mean that "the majority of the infections are found in nail of host other than human" or do you mean that "the infections are found in humans and the majority of the cases are associated with human nail infections"?

2. In description section: just several typos "the are seen to have elongated conidial heads" - "the" changed to "they"? "knowledge about is biochemistry was minimal until recently" - "is" changed to "its"? In ecology section: "too on weak or supressed immune systems" - I'm not sure about this one. Maybe "too" changed to "two"?

3. You briefly mentioned the pathogenicity of Aspergillus ustus throughout your article, maybe you could add a new section on describing it?

Overall nicely done!

Ciel0525 (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)