User talk:Taniquab2014

Welcome!
Hello, Taniquab2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Taniqua king-brown, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Revolution1221 (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Taniqua king-brown


A tag has been placed on Taniqua king-brown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Revolution1221 (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Boston College
Are you a professor at Boston College who has given an assignment to their students to rapidly create a series of articles about themselves and the college? If yes, please instruct them to stop and examine the Wikipedia rules and guidelines regarding appropriate articles. Most notably WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. If no, please put me in touch with someone on the faculty who has so I may discuss with them how to appropriately contribute to Wikipedia. Mkdw talk 23:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Amy lacombe
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amy lacombe, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bc.edu/schools/csom/undergraduate/portico/faculty/LaCombe_Amy.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amy lacombe


A tag has been placed on Amy lacombe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mkdw talk 00:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Revolution1221 (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

April 2013
Hello, I'm Kathovo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Boston College, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  K a t h o v o  talk 19:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blues with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Writing with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. (t) Josve05a  (c)  19:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Language. (t) Josve05a  (c)  19:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)