User talk:Tannehilltop

Nomination of California's 39th congressional district election, 2018 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article California's 39th congressional district election, 2018 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/California's 39th congressional district election, 2018 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia's 10th congressional district election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honeypot ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Virginia%27s_10th_congressional_district_election%2C_2018 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Virginia%27s_10th_congressional_district_election%2C_2018?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Nathan Larson (political candidate)
What were you doing with this article? Drmies (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Clarifying/correcting. Tannehilltop (talk) 00:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * You changed things in a way that conflicted with the sources, even changing a direct quotation, and you added a middle name and DoB without evidence. Drmies (talk) 01:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there is a more recent source to support a change in the quote, but maybe we should just go with the secondary source anyway. Tannehilltop (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

"Medicare for all" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Medicare for all. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 20:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)