User talk:Tannim101

Source on a medical journal
I believe we spoke in the IRC help channel about sources for articles on medical journals, and you mentioned the Scottish Medical Journal as an example of a poorly-sourced article. You're right, and I did some digging; while many Google Books hits for "Scottish Medical Journal" were unhelpful because they were merely citing works published in that journal, this is an impeccable source about the Edinburgh Medical Journal, one of the two that amalgamated into the Scottish Medical Journal. I'll summarize that in the Wikipedia article. I also found another source that, while saying little about the SMJ, used articles published there for linguistic studies, along with ones from NEJM - something that likely wouldn't be done with some minor third-rate journal. I expect numerous further similar sources could be found with appropriate keywords to reduce false positives. Huon (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Journal of paramedic practice


A tag has been placed on Draft:Journal of paramedic practice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Randykitty (talk) 22:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

COI
Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below.
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the journal, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice
A tag has been placed on Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Randykitty (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice. Thanks!  DGG ( talk ) 11:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Journal of paramedic practice cover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Journal of paramedic practice cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Highland PICT Team


The article Highland PICT Team has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG, possible to redirect to hospital article, and merge information backed up by reliable sourcing there, but not sure."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello. Your recent edit to Philip Morant School and College appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. And please read WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 08:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice
Hello, Tannim101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Journal of Paramedic Practice. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Preg xray.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Preg xray.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

TheMouseMen
Hello, I was wondering if you are connected in any way to the editor ? As I wrote on their user talk page, you have both edited pages like BASICS Scotland, the various Journal of Paramedic Practice drafts, and Articles for deletion/Dylan Mulvaney, according to the Interaction Timeline tool. To be clear I'm not accusing you of doing anything wrong - I'm just curious since you have both edited in that specific topic area and then were involved with the recent AfD. Thanks! Bridget (talk) 18:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bridget, I think they’re another medic in scotland, maybe a rig nurse. Yeah I saw they tried to create the Journal page again, I tried a few years ago and it got knocked back, nice of them to try again. Yeah - I saw the Dylan page and couldn’t work out what was actually going on, as in what they were notable for, so I asked in an attempt to understand. I gather TikTok is the “in thing” and that’s why they’re famous, all a bit alien to me. Looks like the decision is that she’s notable? Dunno how a consensus is reached. Tannim101 (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to BASICS Scotland. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up Tannim101 (talk) 07:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Thoracostomy
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thoracostomy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thoracostomy&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1151695096%7CThoracostomy%5D%5D Ask for help])

Physician assistant
In case you haven't seen the recent changes. Dr. Vogel (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks that page is hard work. Tannim101 (talk) 08:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo wildernessmedicalsociety.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo wildernessmedicalsociety.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Williams (academic) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Williams (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julia Williams (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BrigadierG (talk) 11:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Imaginarium Monkey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)