User talk:Tanthalas39/Archives/2009/May

Your comment at the admin board
Please be honest in your answer: what would you do, having faced a tirade of wrongful accusations? Would you not at least try and defend yourself? 87.69.176.81 (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably not. I don't want to block you, but just... let it go. The only sanctions that are going to happen is for your "fuck you, you, you, yer cool, fuck you" attitude that is being constantly displayed - and even then, it's only because you are flooding ANI with this issue. We all have better things to do, you included. I know some of the editors in that discussion can be insufferable; just let it go. Tan   &#124;   39  18:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

DougsTech
I don't understand why anyone paid attention to User:DougsTech's votes in the first place--but you really went overboard. The more I see administrators obsessed with DougsTech the more I want to vote: "Oppose too many administrators" on every RfA.

What is it about trolls on en.wiki that they can garner so much administrator attention? Is it that there are simply so many administrators that there is nothing else to do on en.wiki but engage the trolls?

If you really think he's a troll, ignore him, whether he goes away or not.

It's like listening to newsmen say that Paris Hilton hasn't done anything to earn fame--she's not discussing them. --KP Botany (talk) 07:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Failed Topic Ban
Now that your proposed topic ban has failed, I would suggest not adding your "Go away." response. Replying to the !votes creates the drama, not the !vote itself. --DougsTech (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And your continued !vote will perpetually garner attention from people unfamiliar with your position - regardless of any caveats or people discouraging responses. Something to think about.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 16:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)