User talk:TanyaPerera

Welcome!
Hello, TanyaPerera, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shanaya Singhanina, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 13:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Shanaya Singhanina


A tag has been placed on Shanaya Singhanina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Preetika Rao, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 01:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ishita Ganguly
Hi, I'm Lstanley1979. TanyaPerera, thanks for creating Ishita Ganguly!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello Tanya. Thanks for writing the article. However, all Wikipedia articles must be reliably sourced, or else they are liable to be deleted. In particular, biographies of living people come under close scrutiny for references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. LouiseS1979 (pigeonhole) 10:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tori Gomez


A tag has been placed on Tori Gomez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ishita Ganguly


The article Ishita Ganguly has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. JohnCD (talk) 12:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The same applies to Neha Pednekar and Pragati Chorasiya. Please read Verifiability, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" For anything about living people, that is so important that articles are automatically deleted after seven days if they do not have at least one reliable source that confirms what they say. You should look for sources before you write an article, and include them in your first edit, to avoid premature deletion.


 * You may remove the PROD-blp notices as soon as you have added a reliable source. Note that sites like IMDb and Youtube, or the subject's own website, do not count as reliable sources for Wikipedia, because there is no check on what people write there. For the same reason, Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source.


 * References are needed for another reason: Wikipedia's inclusion test is called Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:ENTERTAINER. Just being an actor or actress is not necessarily enough for an article.


 * There is good advice at WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 13:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ch an  de r  14:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Ch an  de r  16:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neha Pednekar


The article Neha Pednekar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  11:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Radhika Madan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Nath1991 (talk) 14:02, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ishita Ganguly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ishita Ganguly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ishita Ganguly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 15:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Neha Pednekar, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 15:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced content, especially to biographies of living persons. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the continued addition of unsourced material to biography articles following a block for the same disruption. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)